Case Summary
**Case Summary: Maria Pintos v. Pacific Creditors**
**Docket Number:** 04-17558
**Court:** [Specify the court if known]
**Date:** [Provide the date of the case if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Maria Pintos
- **Defendant:** Pacific Creditors
**Background:**
Maria Pintos filed a lawsuit against Pacific Creditors, alleging that the defendant engaged in unlawful collection practices that violated federal and state debt collection laws. The plaintiff claimed that the actions of Pacific Creditors caused emotional distress and financial harm.
**Claims:**
Pintos asserted multiple claims against Pacific Creditors, including:
1. **Violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA):** The plaintiff alleged that the defendant employed aggressive and misleading tactics in attempts to collect the debt, including harassment and misrepresentation.
2. **State Law Violations:** The lawsuit included claims under state consumer protection laws, asserting that the defendant's conduct was deceptive and constituted unfair trade practices.
3. **Emotional Distress:** Pintos sought damages for emotional distress resulting from the alleged harassment and intimidation by the debt collection agency.
**Legal Proceedings:**
The case proceeded through the appropriate legal channels, with the plaintiff and defendant presenting their arguments. Various motions were filed, including motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment, where the defendant contended that its actions were compliant with applicable laws.
**Ruling:**
[Include the court's ruling if known—whether the case was dismissed, if a decision was rendered in favor of either party, or if it resulted in a settlement.]
**Conclusion:**
The case highlighted significant issues regarding consumer protection and the practices of debt collectors. The outcome underscored the legal rights of consumers against harassment and the importance of compliance with debt collection regulations.
**Note:** Details such as specific dates, court rulings, and additional legal implications would enhance this summary. Please verify with relevant legal sources for comprehensive information.