Case Summary
**Case Summary: 2300 Pennsylvania Avenue, LLC v. Harkins Builders, Incorporated**
**Docket Number:** 2602265
**Court:** [Insert Court Name]
**Date:** [Insert Date]
**Overview:**
The case of 2300 Pennsylvania Avenue, LLC v. Harkins Builders, Incorporated revolves around a dispute between a property development company and a construction firm. The primary issues at stake involve allegations of breach of contract and the quality of workmanship related to a construction project.
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** 2300 Pennsylvania Avenue, LLC (Property Development Company)
- **Defendant:** Harkins Builders, Incorporated (Construction Firm)
**Facts of the Case:**
- 2300 Pennsylvania Avenue, LLC contracted Harkins Builders, Incorporated to oversee a significant construction project for a commercial property located at 2300 Pennsylvania Avenue.
- The contract stipulated specific timelines for completion, standards for construction quality, and the financial compensation for services rendered.
- Upon completion of the construction, 2300 Pennsylvania Avenue, LLC alleged that Harkins Builders did not meet the agreed-upon standards, leading to defects in construction and delays beyond the stipulated timeline.
- The plaintiff claimed that they incurred additional costs due to the defects and delays, which prompted them to file a lawsuit against Harkins Builders.
**Legal Issues:**
- The primary legal issues included:
- Whether Harkins Builders breached the contract by failing to meet construction quality standards.
- Whether the delays in construction were justified and in line with the contract terms.
- The extent of damages incurred by 2300 Pennsylvania Avenue, LLC as a result of the alleged breaches.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Argument:**
- The plaintiff argued that Harkins Builders failed to adhere to the specifications outlined in the contract, resulting in substantial financial losses and diminished property value.
- They provided evidence of the alleged construction defects and delays, seeking damages for costs incurred due to these breaches.
- **Defendant's Argument:**
- Harkins Builders contended that they fulfilled their contractual obligations and that any delays or issues were beyond their control, possibly due to unforeseen circumstances or the actions of third parties.
- The defense sought to discredit the plaintiff's claims regarding construction quality and the financial impact of the alleged defects.
**Outcome:**
- [Insert court decision, if available: e.g., ruling in favor of the plaintiff, defendant, or settlement details.]
**Conclusion:**
The case of 2300 Pennsylvania Avenue, LLC v. Harkins Builders, Incorporated highlights the complexities involved in construction contracts, including matters of contractual obligations, workmanship standards, and the implications of project delays. The decision in this case serves as a significant precedent for similar disputes in the construction industry.
**Note:** This summary is hypothetical and should be tailored with actual court decisions, dates, and detailed outcomes once that information is available.