Case Summary
**Case Summary: Ford v. ITT Hartford Insurance**
**Docket Number:** 3-55216 **Case Number:** 7859502
**Court:** Not specified (likely a state or federal court depending on jurisdiction)
**Date:** Not specified
**Overview:**
In the case of Ford v. ITT Hartford Insurance, the plaintiff, Ford, brought a lawsuit against ITT Hartford Insurance Company regarding a dispute over an insurance policy. The details of the case revolve around claims made by Ford pertaining to coverage, benefits, or compensation under the terms of the insurance policy issued by ITT Hartford.
**Facts of the Case:**
- The plaintiff, Ford, had an insurance policy issued by ITT Hartford Insurance.
- Following an event (the nature of which would determine the specifics—could be an accident, property damage, etc.), Ford filed a claim with ITT Hartford for compensation.
- ITT Hartford allegedly denied or disputed the claim based on specific policy provisions.
- Ford contended that the denial was unjustifiable and sought legal recourse to enforce the policy terms and receive the benefits owed.
**Issues:**
- Whether ITT Hartford's denial of Ford's claim was consistent with the terms of the insurance policy.
- Whether Ford was entitled to the requested benefits under the policy.
- Any potential defenses or justifications that ITT Hartford may present regarding the denial of the claim.
**Court's Findings:**
The outcome would depend on the presented evidence, the interpretation of the insurance policy, and the applicable state or federal insurance laws. The court likely assessed:
- The specific terms and conditions of the insurance policy.
- The circumstances surrounding the claim made by Ford.
- Previous case law regarding similar disputes between policyholders and insurance companies.
**Conclusion:**
The court ultimately ruled on the enforcement of the insurance policy regarding Ford's claim. A ruling in favor of Ford would mean that ITT Hartford must provide the benefits due under the policy, whereas a ruling in favor of ITT Hartford would uphold the denial of the claim.
**Impact:**
The decision in this case could set a precedent for similar cases involving insurance claims, especially regarding the obligation of insurers to act in good faith and the interpretation of insurance contract provisions.
**Note:** For further details and specific rulings, a review of the actual court documents would be necessary as this summary provides a generalized outline of the potential content and outcomes of the case based on common legal principles.