Legal Case Summary

Adam Horstman v. City of Hillsboro


Date Argued: Mon Mar 05 2018
Case Number: 16-35986
Docket Number: 6324504
Judges:N.R. Smith, Hurwitz, Curiel
Duration: 25 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Adam Horstman v. City of Hillsboro** **Docket Number:** 6324504 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Adam Horstman - **Defendant:** City of Hillsboro **Background:** Adam Horstman filed a case against the City of Hillsboro, alleging [insert specific claims, e.g., wrongful termination, civil rights violations, personal injury, etc.]. The case stems from incidents that occurred on [insert date or timeframe], where the plaintiff contends that actions taken by the City or its employees [insert brief description of the alleged actions]. **Claims:** Horstman’s primary claims involve [insert details of claims, such as violation of specific laws, damages sought, etc.]. He argues that the City of Hillsboro [insert any key allegations such as negligence, failure to enforce regulations, etc.]. **Defendant's Response:** The City of Hillsboro responded by [insert a brief overview of the city's defense and any counterarguments]. They may argue that [insert key defenses offered by the City, such as sovereign immunity, lack of evidence, etc.]. **Procedural History:** The case was filed on [insert filing date] and has undergone various pre-trial motions, including [insert any noteworthy motions such as motion to dismiss, summary judgment, etc.]. [Include any significant rulings or orders made by the court]. **Current Status:** As of [insert current date], the case remains ongoing with [insert information on next steps, such as scheduled hearings, trial dates, or settlements]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include [insert main legal questions, statutes relevant to the case, and any significant legal precedents]. **Impact:** The outcome of Horstman v. City of Hillsboro could have implications for [insert potential impact on the community, city policies, legal precedents, etc.]. **Conclusion:** The case is indicative of [insert broader legal, social, or political implications related to the case, if applicable]. Further developments will determine the legal standing of both parties involved. **Note:** For detailed information on court proceedings or specific legal arguments, refer to official court documents and filings associated with docket number 6324504. [This summary is a generic template; ensure to insert correct and specific details based on the case information available.]

Adam Horstman v. City of Hillsboro


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available