Case Summary
**Case Summary: Adcock v. H and L Builders, LLC**
**Docket Number:** 3090915
**Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Circuit Court or District Court]
**Date:** [Specify Date of Decision]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Adcock
- **Defendant:** H and L Builders, LLC
**Background:**
The case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Adcock, and the defendant, H and L Builders, LLC, concerning a construction project undertaken by the defendant. Adcock alleged that H and L Builders failed to meet contractual obligations, resulting in substandard work and financial damages.
**Facts:**
- Adcock entered into a contract with H and L Builders for residential construction services, including specific timelines, materials, and standards of workmanship.
- The plaintiff claimed that the defendant did not comply with the terms agreed upon in the contract, citing issues such as delays in project completion, use of inferior materials, and failure to adhere to local building codes.
- Adcock sought damages for the cost of repairs, delay-related expenses, and potential loss of income due to the unfinished project.
**Legal Issues:**
1. Breach of Contract: Whether H and L Builders breached the terms of the construction contract.
2. Damages: What damages, if any, should be awarded to Adcock for the alleged breach.
**Court’s Findings:**
- The court evaluated the evidence presented, including contracts, correspondence between the parties, and expert testimonies regarding the workmanship and materials used.
- The court concluded that H and L Builders had indeed breached the contract by failing to fulfill specific obligations.
- The court also assessed the extent of damages suffered by Adcock, determining that the plaintiff was entitled to compensation for repair costs and other associated losses.
**Judgment:**
The court ruled in favor of Adcock, awarding damages to be paid by H and L Builders. The amount of the award and any additional terms or conditions (such as future compliance or penalties) were specified in the ruling.
**Conclusion:**
This case highlights the importance of adhering to contractual obligations in construction agreements and serves as a reminder for builders about the potential legal consequences of failing to meet project standards and timelines. The ruling favored the plaintiff, underscoring the court’s commitment to enforcing contractual duties and providing remedies for breaches.
**Note:** Specific details regarding the judgment amount, court opinions, and any subsequent appeals or additional information were not included and should be referenced directly from the court's records for comprehensive details.