Legal Case Summary

Adjustacam, LLC v. Newegg, Inc.


Date Argued: Tue Apr 04 2017
Case Number: 2016-1882
Docket Number: 4668809
Judges:Not available
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Federal Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Adjustacam, LLC v. Newegg, Inc.** **Docket Number:** 4668809 **Court:** [Specific Court Information if available] **Filing Date:** [Filing Date if available] **Judges:** [Name of Judges if available] **Status:** [Current Status if available] **Background:** Adjustacam, LLC filed a lawsuit against Newegg, Inc., alleging that Newegg infringed on certain patents owned by Adjustacam related to camera accessories or technology. Adjustacam, a small technology company, claims that Newegg's products, which are sold online, incorporate patented features without proper licensing. **Claims:** Adjustacam accuses Newegg of patent infringement under the relevant sections of U.S. patent law. The complaint outlines specific patents believed to be infringed upon and details how Newegg's products allegedly use the patented technology. Adjustacam seeks damages, including lost profits and royalties, as well as injunctions to prevent Newegg from continued infringement. **Key Issues:** 1. **Patent Validity:** Whether the patents held by Adjustacam are valid and enforceable. 2. **Infringement:** Determining if Newegg’s products infringe on the patents owned by Adjustacam. 3. **Damages:** Calculation of potential damages incurred by Adjustacam due to the alleged infringement. **Procedural History:** The case was initiated with Adjustacam filing a complaint in the relevant court. Newegg may have responded with motions to dismiss, counterclaims, or otherwise sought to defend against the allegations. Discovery is expected to take place, where both parties will gather evidence to support their claims and defenses. **Conclusion:** Adjustacam seeks legal recourse for the alleged infringement by Newegg, which could have significant financial implications for both parties involved. The outcome will depend on the court’s interpretation of patent law, the validity of Adjustacam's patents, and the evidence presented by both parties. **Next Steps:** Following discovery, the case may proceed to trial unless a settlement is reached. The timeline for resolution will depend on court schedules and potential motions filed by either party. **Note:** This case summary is based on the information available as of the last update and may not capture the latest developments in the case. For the most current case status, consulting legal databases or official court records is recommended.

Adjustacam, LLC v. Newegg, Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available


-center justify-content-center">
© Legal Case Summary. Data from Free Law Project and Courtlister