Legal Case Summary

Adrian King, Jr. v. Jim Rubenstein


Date Argued: Wed Jan 27 2016
Case Number: SC18793
Docket Number: 3031940
Judges:Roger L. Gregory, Allyson K. Duncan, Henry F. Floyd
Duration: 46 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Adrian King, Jr. v. Jim Rubenstein** **Docket Number:** 3031940 **Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia] **Date:** [Insert date of decision or filing if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Adrian King, Jr. - **Defendant:** Jim Rubenstein **Background:** Adrian King, Jr. filed a lawsuit against Jim Rubenstein, involving issues related to [insert specific legal issues or claims, e.g., wrongful termination, violation of civil rights, etc.]. The case may stem from incidents occurring at [mention relevant place or institution, such as a correctional facility or state agency], where both parties were associated. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case may have included allegations of [insert key legal claims, such as discrimination, negligence, or breach of duty]. The plaintiff accused the defendant of [summarize the allegations against the defendant], leading to claims for damages and other remedies. **Court Proceedings:** The court proceedings involved [briefly summarize key motions filed, hearings, or any significant rulings made]. The case may have gone through various stages including discovery, pre-trial motions, or settlement discussions before reaching a conclusion. **Ruling:** The court ruled in favor of [either Adrian King, Jr. or Jim Rubenstein], determining that [summarize the court’s decision, including any pertinent findings or legal interpretations]. The court's decision was based on [insert reasons for the ruling, such as insufficient evidence, failure to prove a claim, or legal justifications]. **Implications:** This case is significant because [discuss the broader implications or potential impact on similar cases, legal precedents, or specific communities]. **Conclusion:** Adrian King, Jr. v. Jim Rubenstein represents an important legal matter concerning [summarize the core issues]. The decision reached by the court will likely influence future cases involving [insert relevant issues represented in the case]. (Note: Please add specific details and the context of the case to fill in the blanks as necessary. This summary is a template based on common legal case summaries.)

Adrian King, Jr. v. Jim Rubenstein


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available