Case Summary
**Case Summary: Alejandro Caballero v. Kelly Harrington, Warden**
**Docket Number:** 7839741
**Court:** [Specify Court, if known]
**Date:** [Specify Date, if known]
**Overview:**
The case of Alejandro Caballero v. Kelly Harrington, Warden, involves a legal dispute where the petitioner, Alejandro Caballero, challenges actions or decisions made by Kelly Harrington, who serves as the warden of the correctional facility where Caballero is incarcerated.
**Facts:**
- Alejandro Caballero is an inmate serving a sentence at the facility managed by Warden Kelly Harrington.
- The specifics of the grievance or complaint brought forth by Caballero may include issues related to his treatment while incarcerated, conditions of confinement, due process rights, or other violations of his legal rights.
- The case may also involve questions regarding Caballero’s access to legal resources, healthcare, or other services necessary for his well-being while in custody.
**Legal Issues:**
The primary legal issues in this case likely center around constitutional rights, particularly:
- Eighth Amendment claims concerning cruel and unusual punishment.
- Due process violations if Caballero contends that his rights were not upheld during disciplinary proceedings or other administrative actions.
**Arguments:**
- **Petitioner’s Arguments (Caballero):**
- Caballero may assert that his treatment by Warden Harrington and the prison staff violates his constitutional rights.
- The petition might detail specific incidents or policies that reflect inadequate care, abusive practices, or other grievances that prompted the legal action.
- **Respondent’s Arguments (Harrington):**
- Warden Harrington will likely defend the policies and practices of the correction facility, arguing that they comply with legal standards.
- The defense may challenge the validity of Caballero’s claims, asserting that all actions taken are within the scope of lawful authority and consistent with established procedures.
**Procedural History:**
- The case may have originated in a lower court or was initiated as a civil rights complaint.
- Depending on the jurisdiction, it might have undergone various stages, including motions to dismiss, hearings, and potential appeals.
**Conclusion:**
The outcome of Alejandro Caballero v. Kelly Harrington will hinge on the court's interpretation of constitutional rights as they apply to inmates and the evidence presented by both parties. The case emphasizes the ongoing discourse surrounding prisoners' rights and the responsibilities of correctional administrators.
*Note: More specific details regarding the court's rulings, date of filing, and the exact nature of the complaints would provide a clearer picture of the case's significance.*