Legal Case Summary

Aleta Lilly v. Conagra Foods, Inc.


Date Argued: Thu Feb 06 2014
Case Number: 12-55921
Docket Number: 7836701
Judges:Vinson, Silverman, Hurwitz
Duration: 28 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Aleta Lilly v. Conagra Foods, Inc.** **Docket Number:** 7836701 **Court:** [Specify Court] **Date:** [Specify Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Aleta Lilly - **Defendant:** Conagra Foods, Inc. **Background:** Aleta Lilly filed a lawsuit against Conagra Foods, Inc. alleging [briefly state the main claims, e.g., product liability, negligence, breach of contract, etc.]. The case arises from incidents involving [specify the nature of the incident, such as injuries caused by a defective product or issues related to food safety]. **Facts:** The plaintiff, Aleta Lilly, asserts that [summarize key facts that led to the lawsuit, including when and where the incident occurred, any relevant details about the product in question, and how it allegedly led to the plaintiff's harm or damages]. Lilly claims that Conagra Foods failed to [mention any alleged failures, such as providing adequate warnings, ensuring product safety, or adhering to industry standards]. **Legal Issues:** The case primarily revolves around [identify the legal issues at play, such as the standard of care required by the manufacturer, liability for product defects, or any other legal theories presented by the plaintiff]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments:** Lilly argues that Conagra Foods acted negligently by [elaborate on specific claims, such as improper manufacturing processes, lack of sufficient testing, failure to address known safety issues, etc.]. The plaintiff seeks [describe the remedy sought, e.g., compensatory damages, punitive damages, etc.]. - **Defendant's Arguments:** Conagra Foods contends that [summarize the defense's position, such as denying liability, arguing that the plaintiff misused the product, or asserting that the product met all regulatory standards]. The defendant may also argue that [any additional defenses or counterclaims]. **Outcome:** [If the case has reached a conclusion, provide the outcome such as a verdict or settlement. If it is still ongoing, indicate its current status]. **Significance:** This case is significant as it highlights [mention any broader implications such as the importance of consumer safety, manufacturer accountability, or developments in product liability law]. The resolution of this case may influence [mention any potential impact on future cases, industry practices, or regulatory policies]. **Conclusion:** Aleta Lilly v. Conagra Foods, Inc. addresses critical issues of [summarize the overarching themes of the case]. [Speculate on the next steps if the case is ongoing, such as further hearings or potential settlement discussions]. **Note:** For specific recent developments, judicial opinions, or intricate legal analyses, please refer to the official court records or legal databases associated with docket number 7836701.

Aleta Lilly v. Conagra Foods, Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available