Legal Case Summary

Alfredo Lam v. City & County of San Francisco


Date Argued: Wed Mar 12 2014
Case Number: 12-16349
Docket Number: 7836462
Judges:Quist, McKeown, Gould
Duration: 29 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Alfredo Lam v. City & County of San Francisco** **Docket Number:** 7836462 **Court:** [Insert Court Name Here] **Filing Date:** [Insert Filing Date Here] **Overview:** Alfredo Lam, the plaintiff, brought a case against the City and County of San Francisco, the defendant, concerning [insert brief description of the dispute, such as a zoning issue, employment matter, violation of rights, etc.]. The case primarily revolves around [insert key legal issues or facts]. **Facts:** - Alfredo Lam alleges that [insert key facts about what Alfredo Lam claims, e.g., he faced discrimination, improper denial of a permit, wrongful termination, etc.]. - The events leading to this case include [insert chronological sequence of events that led to the lawsuit]. - Lam asserts that the actions of the City and County of San Francisco were in violation of [insert specific laws or regulations that are relevant]. **Legal Issues:** 1. [Insert primary legal issue or claim, e.g., whether the city engaged in unlawful discrimination under state or federal law]. 2. [Insert any additional claims or defenses raised by either party]. 3. [Discuss any jurisdictional issues if applicable]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff (Alfredo Lam):** - Claims that [summarize the key arguments made by Lam, including evidence presented]. - [Mention any legal precedents or statutes cited in support of Lam’s claims]. - **Defendant (City & County of San Francisco):** - Contends that [summarize the key arguments made by the city]. - [Mention any defenses raised, such as qualified immunity, compliance with law, etc.]. **Outcome:** [Include the outcome of the case if available, e.g., decision, ruling, or settlement. If the case is ongoing, mention that the case is pending resolution and provide the next scheduled court date if applicable.] **Significance:** This case illuminates [discuss the broader implications of the case, such as impact on local government policies, changes in law, or influence on similar cases]. **Conclusion:** The case of Alfredo Lam v. City & County of San Francisco raises important questions regarding [recap key legal issues], and its resolution will have significant implications for [discuss who may be affected, including individuals and the city]. Further developments in the case will be closely watched by [stakeholders, communities, interest groups]. **Note:** [You may want to add disclaimers about the information being a summary and not legal advice, and indicate that parties should consult legal professionals for specific guidance or information].

Alfredo Lam v. City & County of San Francisco


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available