Case Summary
**Case Summary: Alma Glisson v. Correctional Medical Services**
**Docket Number:** 4419781
**Court:** [Specific Court Name], [Jurisdiction]
**Date:** [Relevant Dates, e.g., Filing Date, Decision Date]
**Parties:**
- **Plaintiff:** Alma Glisson
- **Defendant:** Correctional Medical Services
**Background:**
Alma Glisson filed a lawsuit against Correctional Medical Services (CMS), alleging inadequate medical care during her incarceration. Glisson contended that the medical services provided were substandard and failed to address her serious health issues, which led to significant suffering and deterioration of her health.
**Legal Claims:**
Glisson's claims included violations of her Eighth Amendment rights, which protect against cruel and unusual punishment. She argued that the deliberate indifference to her medical needs by CMS constituted a violation of her constitutional rights. The plaintiff sought damages for pain and suffering, as well as for medical expenses incurred due to the alleged negligence.
**Key Issues:**
1. Whether CMS provided adequate medical care to Glisson during her time in custody.
2. Whether CMS's actions or inactions constituted “deliberate indifference” as defined under the Eighth Amendment.
3. The extent of Glisson's injuries and the impact of the alleged inadequate medical care on her overall health.
**Court Proceedings:**
During the litigation, testimony was provided by medical experts, correctional staff, and Glisson herself. The defense argued that all medical decisions were made based on available resources and the judgment of medical personnel, asserting that there was no deliberate indifference to Glisson’s needs.
**Decision:**
[The outcome of the case, including whether the court ruled in favor of Glisson or CMS, any awarded damages, and reasoning behind the decision.]
**Significance:**
This case underscores critical issues regarding the provision of medical care in correctional facilities and the standards for evaluating claims of inadequate medical treatment. The ruling highlights the responsibilities of correctional health services to deliver adequate care and the constitutional protections afforded to incarcerated individuals.
**Conclusion:**
Alma Glisson v. Correctional Medical Services serves as an essential reference for future cases involving healthcare in correctional settings, addressing the balance between facility resources and the legal rights of inmates to receive necessary medical care.
**Note:** Specific details such as court rulings, reasoning, dates, and additional context would need to be filled in based on actual case documentation and outcomes, as this is a generalized summary.