Case Summary
**Case Summary: Amanda Riggio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated**
**Docket Number:** 4583069
**Court:** [Insert Court Name]
**Date:** [Insert Date of Filing/Resolution]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Amanda Riggio
- **Defendant:** Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated
**Background:**
This case involves a civil lawsuit filed by Amanda Riggio against Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated. The plaintiff alleges that she suffered injuries due to the negligence of Wal-Mart's employees or the unsafe condition of the store property. The specifics of the case involve [insert details of the incident, e.g., a slip and fall accident, failure to maintain safe premises, etc.].
**Claims:**
Amanda Riggio's claims against Wal-Mart include negligence and perhaps other related tort claims. She asserts that Wal-Mart had a duty to maintain a safe environment for its customers and that this duty was breached, leading to her injuries.
**Legal Issues:**
1. **Negligence:** Did Wal-Mart breach its duty of care to ensure customer safety?
2. **Damages:** What damages is Amanda Riggio claiming as a result of the alleged negligence?
**Procedural History:**
- The complaint was filed on [insert date of filing].
- Wal-Mart responded with [insert brief details about the response, such as a motion to dismiss or answer].
- Discovery processes occurred, wherein both parties exchanged evidence and identified witnesses.
**Outcome:**
[Insert outcome of the case; was there a ruling, settlement, trial verdict? If it is pending or ongoing, summarize the current status.]
**Significance:**
This case emphasizes the responsibilities of retail establishments to ensure the safety of their premises. It may set precedents regarding liability and the extent to which businesses must go to prevent accidents.
**Notes:**
- Further legal implications and potential impacts on similar cases in the future.
- Information on whether this case was appealed, and if so, the status of that appeal.
**Conclusion:**
The resolution of Amanda Riggio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated will contribute to the body of case law regarding premises liability and the responsibilities of businesses to protect their customers from foreseeable harm. The case underscores the importance of maintaining safe environments in retail settings to mitigate risks of injury to patrons.