Legal Case Summary

Americredit Financial Services v. Marlene Penrod


Date Argued: Thu Nov 05 2009
Case Number: 08-60037
Docket Number: 7848723
Judges:Mills, Goodwin, Fletcher W.
Duration: 37 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: AmeriCredit Financial Services v. Marlene Penrod** **Docket Number:** 7848723 **Court:** [Specify Court if known] **Date:** [Specify Date if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** AmeriCredit Financial Services - **Defendant:** Marlene Penrod **Background:** AmeriCredit Financial Services, a company engaged in providing financial services, particularly related to auto financing, filed a lawsuit against Marlene Penrod. The case revolves around allegations of default on a loan agreement or financing arrangement provided by AmeriCredit to Penrod. **Facts of the Case:** - AmeriCredit provided financing for an automobile purchase to Marlene Penrod. - Penrod allegedly failed to make the required payments as outlined in the financing agreement. - AmeriCredit subsequently sought to recover the outstanding debt through legal action, asserting that they had made attempts to resolve the matter outside of court but were unsuccessful. **Legal Issues:** The principal legal issues in this case include: - Breach of contract: whether Marlene Penrod violated the terms of the financing agreement. - Recovery of damages: whether AmeriCredit is entitled to collect the outstanding balance, including any accrued interest or fees due to the alleged default. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** AmeriCredit contends that Penrod is in default of her payment obligations and seeks to recover the amount owed, plus interest, and any additional costs incurred due to the default. - **Defendant’s Argument:** Penrod may argue that she either had a valid reason for her payment issues (e.g., financial hardship) or contest the validity of the debt claimed by AmeriCredit. **Outcome:** [As this information was not provided, include here any known outcomes, such as court ruling, settlement, or ongoing litigation status.] **Significance:** This case illustrates the complexities of auto financing agreements and the legal recourse available to lenders in the event of borrower defaults. It highlights the importance of complying with payment terms and the potential repercussions of failing to do so. (Note: This summary is a general representation of what such a case might entail. The specifics—such as court, actual facts, and outcome—may vary based on the actual legal documents and proceedings.)

Americredit Financial Services v. Marlene Penrod


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available