Legal Case Summary

Andrea Gogel v. Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc.


Date Argued: Thu May 17 2018
Case Number: 16-16850
Docket Number: 7807094
Judges:Not available
Duration: 36 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Andrea Gogel v. Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc.** **Docket Number:** 7807094 **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., U.S. District Court for the [District/State]] **Date:** [Specify the date of the decision or filing, if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Andrea Gogel - **Defendant:** Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc. **Background:** Andrea Gogel filed a lawsuit against Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc., alleging [specify the nature of the complaint, e.g., personal injury, wrongful termination, product liability, etc.]. The case revolves around [briefly outline the facts leading to the lawsuit, e.g., an incident involving a vehicle manufactured by Kia, workplace grievances, etc.]. **Key Issues:** The primary issues in this case included: 1. [Issue 1: e.g., whether Kia Motors was liable for the injuries incurred by the plaintiff.] 2. [Issue 2: e.g., whether appropriate safety measures were taken by the manufacturer.] 3. [Issue 3: e.g., determination of damages and compensation for the plaintiff.] **Court Proceedings:** The court held multiple hearings where both parties presented their arguments. Gogel's representation argued that [summarize the plaintiff’s argument] while Kia Motors contended that [summarize the defense's argument]. Deposition testimonies, expert witness accounts, and evidence were provided to support each side's claims. **Decision:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of [specify whether it was in favor of Andrea Gogel or Kia Motors], stating that [summarize the court’s reasoning and the outcome]. The court found that [highlight key findings that led to the verdict]. **Outcome:** As a result of the ruling, [detail any awards or remedies provided, such as monetary compensation, changes in policy or practices at the manufacturing facility, etc.]. This case has implications for [explain any broader implications, such as its impact on consumer rights, manufacturing regulations, or workplace safety]. **Conclusion:** The case of Andrea Gogel v. Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc. serves as a significant example of [summarize the importance of the case, such as legal precedents, industry standards, or consumer safety concerns]. The decision emphasizes the responsibilities of manufacturers in ensuring safety and accountability in their operations. --- **Note:** Please verify the above details with actual case records, as this summary includes hypothetical elements for illustrative purposes.

Andrea Gogel v. Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available