Case Summary
**Case Summary: Angela Brinley v. Nancy Berryhill, Docket Number 6241054**
**Court:** United States District Court
**Filed:** Date of filing not specified in provided information
**Judge:** [Name of the presiding judge] (not specified)
**Nature of Suit:** Review of Social Security Administration decision
**Background:**
Angela Brinley filed a case against Nancy Berryhill, the former Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Brinley sought judicial review of the Social Security Administration's decision regarding her entitlement to disability benefits. The case centers on whether the denial of benefits was justified based on the evidence presented and whether the administrative law judge's (ALJ) findings were supported by substantial evidence.
**Issues:**
- The primary issue in this case is the denial of disability benefits to Angela Brinley by the Social Security Administration.
- Key questions include whether the ALJ properly evaluated Brinley’s medical records, her testimony, and the testimonies of any witnesses related to her claim.
**Decision:**
Details regarding the court's ruling are not provided in the initial information. The decision would typically involve the court affirming, reversing, or remanding the decision made by the ALJ, based on the findings of fact and law.
**Significance:**
This case is significant as it illustrates the procedural aspects of appealing a disability benefits decision within the Social Security framework, the role of the federal judiciary in reviewing these administrative decisions, and the importance of thorough documentation and evidence in disability claims.
**Next Steps:**
Further actions may include an appeal to a higher court if either party is dissatisfied with the ruling. The details of the court's decision would clarify the outcome for Brinley regarding her eligibility for the claimed benefits.
(Note: Specific details such as the factual background, the court's opinion, findings, and subsequent actions would typically be included for a more comprehensive summary, depending on available case law and information.)