Case Summary
**Case Summary: Anthony Harris v. DC Water and Sewer Authority**
**Docket Number:** 2595652
**Court:** [Specify Court if known, e.g., District of Columbia Court]
**Date:** [Specify Date if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Anthony Harris
- **Defendant:** DC Water and Sewer Authority
**Background:**
The case involves Anthony Harris as the plaintiff against the DC Water and Sewer Authority, a municipal utility responsible for providing water and sewer services in Washington, D.C. While specific facts of the case are not detailed in the prompt, typically, such cases might arise from issues related to water service accessibility, billing disputes, infrastructure concerns, service interruptions, or other administrative grievances that a customer may have with the utility.
**Legal Issues:**
The legal issues at stake could encompass various claims such as:
- Breach of contract
- Negligence or improper services
- Regulatory compliance matters
- Challenges related to the agency's policies or actions
**Proceedings:**
The procedural history of the case would involve filing by the plaintiff, possible discovery phases, pre-trial motions, hearings, or settlement discussions. As typical in utility-related disputes, evidence would likely include service records, billing statements, correspondence between the parties, and testimony regarding the claims made.
**Outcome:**
The outcome of the case would hinge on the specific facts, evidence presented, and legal arguments. Potential resolutions could range from a dismissal of the case, a ruling in favor of one party, ordering specific performance, or awarding damages.
**Significance:**
This case could have implications for the regulatory practices of the DC Water and Sewer Authority, as well as impacting service delivery standards for other customers. Additionally, it may address legal precedents regarding consumer rights against municipal services.
**Conclusion:**
While the specific details and outcome of the case of Anthony Harris v. DC Water and Sewer Authority are not defined here, it represents a critical intersection between municipal services, consumer rights, and administrative law. Further updates would be necessary to provide a complete picture of this case.