Case Summary
**Case Summary: Arellano-Mendoza v. Holder**
**Docket Number:** 7847524
**Court:** United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
**Date:** [Insert Date of Decision]
**Parties:**
- **Petitioner:** Francisco Arellano-Mendoza
- **Respondent:** Eric Holder, Attorney General of the United States
**Facts:**
Francisco Arellano-Mendoza, a native and citizen of Mexico, was ordered to be removed from the United States based on an immigration judge’s decision that found him to be ineligible for relief from removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act. Arellano-Mendoza had applied for cancellation of removal, claiming that his removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his U.S. citizen children.
**Procedural History:**
Arellano-Mendoza appealed the immigration judge's decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which upheld the removal order. He subsequently sought review from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
**Issues:**
1. Whether the BIA erred in denying Arellano-Mendoza's application for cancellation of removal based on the claim of hardship to his children.
2. Whether the standard of exceptional and extremely unusual hardship was appropriately applied in this case.
**Holding:**
The Ninth Circuit reviewed the matter and found that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Arellano-Mendoza’s application for cancellation of removal. The Court held that the evidence presented did not sufficiently establish the level of hardship required under the statutory framework.
**Reasoning:**
The Court reasoned that while Arellano-Mendoza demonstrated that his children would face difficulties if he were removed, the evidence did not rise to the level of "exceptional and extremely unusual hardship" as required by law. The Court emphasized the framework for evaluating hardship claims and noted that general hardship does not meet the threshold necessary for cancellation of removal.
**Conclusion:**
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the decision of the BIA, upholding the order of removal against Francisco Arellano-Mendoza. The Court emphasized the stringent standards that applicants for cancellation of removal must meet, particularly regarding the showing of hardship to qualifying relatives.
**Significance:**
This case underscores the high burden placed on non-citizens seeking cancellation of removal based on hardship claims, highlighting the importance of demonstrating exceptional circumstances that surpass ordinary difficulties faced by families in immigration proceedings.
**Note:** The specific details regarding the date of the decision, additional facts, and arguments presented by both sides may be needed for a complete case summary.