Legal Case Summary

Arezou Mansourian v. Regents of the University of C


Date Argued: Thu Oct 08 2009
Case Number: 08-16330
Docket Number: 7848968
Judges:Shadur, Schroeder, Berzon
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Arezou Mansourian v. Regents of the University of California, Docket No. 7848968** **Court:** [Specify Court Name, e.g., Superior Court of California] **Filing Date:** [Insert Filing Date] **Plaintiff:** Arezou Mansourian **Defendant:** Regents of the University of California **Case Background:** Arezou Mansourian filed a lawsuit against the Regents of the University of California, alleging [specific claims, such as employment discrimination, wrongful termination, or violations of civil rights]. The plaintiff claims that [briefly outline the facts leading to the case, including the nature of the allegations and relevant events, such as employment history, specific incidents of discrimination or retaliation, and the impact on the plaintiff]. **Legal Issues:** The central legal issues in this case include: 1. **[First Legal Issue]:** [Describe the primary legal claim, e.g., whether the plaintiff was subjected to unlawful discrimination under applicable laws]. 2. **[Second Legal Issue]:** [If applicable, discuss any additional claims, such as retaliation, failure to accommodate, or violation of academic policies]. 3. **[Third Legal Issue]:** [Add any other relevant legal issues, if pertinent]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments:** Arezou Mansourian argues that the university failed to provide a discrimination-free environment and that the actions of university officials constituted [state whether the allegations involve hostile work environment, violation of policies, etc.]. The plaintiff seeks [details of the remedy sought, e.g., damages, reinstatement, policy changes]. - **Defendant's Arguments:** The Regents of the University of California contend that the accusations are unfounded and assert defenses such as [ summarize defenses, e.g., that they followed proper procedures, that there was no discrimination, or that they provided reasonable accommodations as required]. **Current Status:** As of [insert date], the case is in [specify whether it is in discovery, awaiting trial, or has made it to a summary judgment]. The court schedule includes [important dates, such as hearings, motions filed, or other procedural steps]. **Conclusion:** This case highlights critical issues regarding [summarize the broader implications of the case, such as workplace equality, institutional accountability, or the importance of adhering to employment laws]. The outcome may set a precedent regarding [any relevant issues particular to the case]. **Note:** Further developments in the case can be monitored for updates regarding hearings, motions, and final judgments. --- Please ensure to fill in the placeholders with specific information and claims associated with the case for an accurate and comprehensive summary.

Arezou Mansourian v. Regents of the University of C


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available