Legal Case Summary

Arthur Anderson v. Cal Terhune


Date Argued: Mon Dec 06 2010
Case Number: 09-17566
Docket Number: 7846648
Judges:Cowen, Tashima, Silverman
Duration: 29 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Arthur Anderson v. Cal Terhune** **Docket Number:** 7846648 **Court:** [Specify court if known, e.g., United States District Court] **Date:** [Specify date of the decision] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Arthur Anderson - **Defendant:** Cal Terhune **Background:** This case involves a legal dispute between Arthur Anderson, a plaintiff, and Cal Terhune, the defendant. The details leading up to the case center on [briefly outline the context or nature of the dispute, whether it involves contractual issues, civil rights, negligence, etc.]. **Facts:** 1. Arthur Anderson filed a claim against Cal Terhune alleging [summarize the key allegations made by Anderson]. 2. [Provide facts regarding the events that led to the lawsuit, including any important dates, actions taken by both parties, and relevant documents or agreements]. 3. [Detail any defenses raised by Cal Terhune and how they counter the claims made by Anderson]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues presented in this case included: - [List key legal questions or issues the court needed to address, such as statutory interpretation, breach of contract, etc.]. - [Any relevant legal standards or precedents that apply to the case]. **Court’s Analysis:** The court analyzed the evidence presented, including [mention types of evidence such as testimonies, documents, expert analysis, etc.]. The court assessed whether [explain how the court approached the legal issues, what legal standards were applied, and its interpretation of the facts]. **Outcome:** The court ruled in favor of [indicate which party won and any relevant judgments made]. The decision was based on [summarize the court’s reasoning and any implications of the ruling]. Specific relief granted included [list any damages awarded, injunctions, or other remedies provided]. **Conclusion:** The ruling in Arthur Anderson v. Cal Terhune has significant implications for [discuss any broader impacts on law or social issues, if applicable]. The case underscores [reflect on any lessons or key takeaways from the case]. **Note:** The specifics regarding the court, date, and detailed content of the case are essential for a complete understanding of the legal battle. Please refer to legal databases or court archives for a comprehensive view of case developments and final opinions.

Arthur Anderson v. Cal Terhune


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available