Legal Case Summary

Arthur Cornell v. N Wasco County School District


Date Argued: Thu Jul 09 2015
Case Number: 2186-dd3
Docket Number: 2672880
Judges:Pregerson, Smith, Owens
Duration: 38 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Arthur Cornell v. N. Wasco County School District** **Docket Number:** 2672880 **Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., Oregon Court of Appeals] **Date:** [Insert date if known] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Arthur Cornell - **Defendant:** N. Wasco County School District **Background:** Arthur Cornell initiated a legal action against the N. Wasco County School District, asserting claims related to [specify the nature of the claims, e.g., employment discrimination, wrongful termination, breach of contract, etc.]. The case revolves around the circumstances surrounding [briefly outline the context of the dispute, such as events leading up to the lawsuit, any relevant employment history, and specific actions by the school district that led to the plaintiff's claims]. **Claims:** Cornell's allegations include: - [List key claims, such as violations of specific laws or regulations, failure to follow school district policies, etc.] - [Mention any specific incidents or evidence presented in support of the claims.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments:** Cornell argues that [summarize plaintiff’s key arguments supporting his claims, including any relevant legal theories or evidence]. - **Defendant's Arguments:** The N. Wasco County School District contends that [summarize the school district's defense against the allegations, including any statutory defenses or procedural motions]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include: - [Identify key legal principles at stake, such as interpretation of specific employment laws, procedural issues in the case, etc.] - [Discuss any precedent cases or statutes that are relevant to the arguments presented.] **Outcome:** [If the case has been decided, summarize the court's ruling, including any findings of fact or judgments, as well as any orders for remedies. If the case is ongoing or still under consideration, note that here.] **Conclusion:** The case of Arthur Cornell v. N. Wasco County School District raises important questions about [summarize the significance of the case in relation to employment law, education law, or other relevant fields]. The outcome could have implications for [discussion of potential impacts on similar cases or policies within school districts]. **Next Steps:** - [If applicable, note any scheduled hearings, potential appeals, or further legal actions that may follow.] **Note:** This summary is based on the information available up to October 2023 and should be supplemented with actual case findings and legal documents for accuracy.

Arthur Cornell v. N Wasco County School District


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available