Legal Case Summary

Aspic Engineering and Constr. v. ECC Centcom Constructors LLC


Date Argued: Mon Dec 17 2018
Case Number: 17-16510
Docket Number: 8422473
Judges:M. Smith, Nguyen, Restani
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

Certainly! Here's a case summary for "Aspic Engineering and Construction v. ECC Centcom Constructors LLC" with docket number 8422473: --- **Case Summary: Aspic Engineering and Construction v. ECC Centcom Constructors LLC** **Docket Number:** 8422473 **Court:** [Court Name] **Date Filed:** [Date] **Judges Presiding:** [Judges' Names] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Aspic Engineering and Construction - **Defendant:** ECC Centcom Constructors LLC **Background:** The case arises from a contractual dispute between Aspic Engineering and Construction (the Plaintiff) and ECC Centcom Constructors LLC (the Defendant). The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant breached their contractual obligations related to a construction project that was contracted to be completed by a certain date. The primary issues at stake involve delays, quality of work, and payment disputes. **Key Facts:** 1. **Contractual Agreement:** A detailed construction contract was entered into by both parties, outlining scope, deliverables, timelines, and payment schedules. 2. **Allegations of Breach:** The Plaintiff claims that the Defendant failed to meet agreed-upon deadlines, resulting in significant delays and financial losses. 3. **Quality of Work:** There are allegations regarding the quality of work performed by the Defendant, including failure to adhere to industry standards, which purportedly necessitated further repairs and modifications. 4. **Counterclaims:** The Defendant has filed counterclaims against the Plaintiff regarding non-payment for completed work and other related issues arising from the same project. **Legal Issues:** - Whether ECC Centcom Constructors LLC breached the contract terms. - Whether the delays were justified or if they resulted from the Plaintiff's actions or inactions. - Determination of damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the alleged delays and substandard work. - Consideration of counterclaims raised by ECC Centcom Constructors LLC. **Proceedings:** - The case has undergone preliminary hearings, with both parties exchanging evidence and building their respective arguments. - Several motions have been filed, including motions for summary judgment and requests for discovery of documents pertinent to the case. **Current Status:** As of the latest update, the court is scheduled to set a trial date following the completion of discovery and any pending motions. Both parties are attempting to reach a settlement outside court, but litigation continues to progress. **Implications:** The outcome of this case may have broader implications for contractual enforcement in the construction industry and may set precedents regarding liability for delays and quality issues. --- *Note: The details provided (court name, date filed, judges' names, etc.) should be filled in as per the actual case information, as this summary serves as a template based on common legal case structures.*

Aspic Engineering and Constr. v. ECC Centcom Constructors LLC


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available