Legal Case Summary

ATKINS v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE


Date Argued: Wed Feb 09 2005
Case Number: 03-55844
Docket Number: 7858655
Judges:Pregerson, Canby, Beezer
Duration: 62 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

### Case Summary: Atkins v. County of Riverside **Docket Number:** 7858655 **Court:** [Specific Court Name, if available] **Date:** [Date of the decision if available] #### Parties Involved: - **Plaintiff:** Atkins (full name may vary) - **Defendant:** County of Riverside #### Facts of the Case: Atkins filed a lawsuit against County of Riverside concerning [briefly outline the issue, e.g., civil rights violations, personal injury, negligence, etc.]. The particulars of the case involved [describe the context, such as events leading to the lawsuit, any relevant facts like dates, locations, and actions taken by both parties]. #### Legal Issues: The legal questions presented in the case included: 1. [Primary legal issue, e.g., Did the County of Riverside violate Atkins' rights under specific statutes?] 2. [Additional legal issues, if any, e.g., Was there negligence on part of the County?] #### Court’s Findings: The court analyzed [key elements of the law applicable to the case, such as statutes or case law] and determined that [summarize the court's findings, including legal principles applied]. #### Conclusion: In conclusion, the court [describe the outcome of the case, such as judgment for plaintiff/defendant, damages awarded, or any orders issued]. This case sets a precedent for [mention any implications of the ruling or how it may affect future cases]. #### Significance: The case of Atkins v. County of Riverside is significant in [discuss the broader impact of the case, such as its relevance to public policy, legal standards in tort law, civil rights, etc.]. --- **Note:** Specific details, such as dates, relevant legal statutes, or broader implications, would be necessary for a complete and accurate case summary. If the case has additional layers of complexity or specific findings that are notable, they should be included for thoroughness.

ATKINS v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available