Legal Case Summary

Attebury Grain LLC v. Vicente Cortez


Date Argued: Thu Dec 07 2017
Case Number: 16-55729
Docket Number: 6238364
Judges:Wardlaw, Gould, Collins
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Attebury Grain LLC v. Vicente Cortez** **Docket Number:** 6238364 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., District Court, State of XXX] **Filing Date:** [Insert Filing Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Attebury Grain LLC - **Defendant:** Vicente Cortez **Background:** Attebury Grain LLC, a grain elevator and storage business, brought a lawsuit against Vicente Cortez, an individual involved in agricultural transactions. The dispute arose in connection with a contractual agreement related to the sale and purchase of grain, specifically concerning the quality, quantity, and timely delivery of said grain. **Key Issues:** 1. **Breach of Contract:** The plaintiff alleges that the defendant failed to fulfill his obligations under the contract, leading to financial losses for Attebury Grain LLC. 2. **Damages:** Attebury Grain LLC seeks compensation for the losses incurred due to the alleged breach, including costs related to the procurement of replacement grain and any additional expenses incurred as a result of the delay. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Attebury Grain asserts that Vicente Cortez did not deliver the agreed-upon quantity of grain and that the grain delivered did not meet the specified quality standards, as per the contract terms. They argue that this breach caused significant financial damages and disruption to their operations. - **Defendant's Argument:** Vicente Cortez contends that he complied with the contract to the best of his ability and that any issues regarding the grain quality or quantity were either due to unforeseen circumstances or actions outside his control. He may also argue that Attebury Grain failed to mitigate their damages adequately. **Procedural History:** The case was filed [insert details regarding initial filing] and has gone through various procedural steps, including motions for summary judgment, discovery disputes, and pre-trial conferences. The parties have engaged in settlement discussions but were unable to reach a resolution. **Current Status:** As of [insert current date], the case is set for trial [or specify any upcoming hearings, motions, etc.], where both parties will present their evidence and arguments before the court. The outcome will hinge on the interpretation of the contract terms and the evidence presented regarding the alleged breach and damages. **Conclusion:** The case of Attebury Grain LLC v. Vicente Cortez highlights the complexities involved in agricultural contracts and the significant impact that alleged breaches can have on business operations. The court's decision will likely set a precedent for similar cases involving grain sales and the enforcement of contractual obligations within the agricultural sector. **Next Steps:** The court will continue to oversee the proceedings, with the trial scheduled to occur on [insert trial date]. Both parties will prepare for the presentation of evidence and witness testimonies to substantiate their claims and defenses. [Note: Ensure that you verify the case details, including the actual parties involved, court jurisdiction, and specific procedural timelines applicable to the case.]

Attebury Grain LLC v. Vicente Cortez


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available