Case Summary
**Case Summary: Bard Water District v. James Davey and Associates**
**Docket Number:** 4486674
**Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Superior Court, County of XYZ]
**Date:** [Specify Date of Decision]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Bard Water District
- **Defendants:** James Davey and Associates
**Background:**
Bard Water District, a public agency responsible for providing water services, initiated legal action against James Davey and Associates. The dispute arose over [insert brief reason for the lawsuit, e.g., alleged breach of contract, negligence, performance of services related to water supply, etc.]. The Bard Water District contended that the defendants failed to fulfill their contractual obligations, leading to [insert specific harm or damages, e.g., operational delays, increased costs, disruptions in service].
**Key Issues:**
1. **Breach of Contract:** Whether James Davey and Associates failed to meet the terms outlined in the contract with Bard Water District.
2. **Damages:** Determination of the extent of damages incurred by Bard Water District as a result of the alleged breaches.
3. **Defenses Raised:** Examination of any defenses asserted by James Davey and Associates, such as claims of justification, lack of negligence, or other counterarguments.
**Court's Findings:**
The court examined the contract between the parties, evaluating the obligations of James Davey and Associates in relation to the claims made by Bard Water District. The evidence presented included [mention types of evidence, e.g., contract excerpts, witness testimonies, expert opinions]. The court found that [summarize key findings or conclusions, such as whether the breach was established, and what specific contract terms were violated].
**Conclusion:**
The court ruled in favor of [plaintiff or defendant] based on the evidence and arguments presented. [Summarize the outcome of the case, such as whether damages were awarded, specific actions ordered by the court, or any penalties imposed.]
**Significance:**
This case highlights the importance of adhering to contractual obligations within public service agreements and underscores the potential consequences of non-compliance. It serves as a precedent for similar disputes involving water districts and service providers.
---
*Note: Please add specifics regarding the court's conclusions, the disciplinary actions taken, or further appeals, if available and relevant to the case.*