Case Summary
**Case Summary: Board of Trustees of the IBT Local 863 Pension Fund v. C S Wholesale Grocers**
**Docket Number:** 2624525
**Court:** [Specify Court if known]
**Date:** [Specify Date if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Board of Trustees of the IBT Local 863 Pension Fund
- **Defendant:** C S Wholesale Grocers
**Background:**
The Board of Trustees of the IBT Local 863 Pension Fund filed a lawsuit against C S Wholesale Grocers concerning potential issues related to pension contributions and obligations under an existing collective bargaining agreement. The dispute likely centers around whether C S Wholesale Grocers has complied with its financial commitments to the pension fund, which provides benefits to employees represented by the union.
**Legal Issues:**
The primary legal issues in this case include:
1. Whether C S Wholesale Grocers failed to make required contributions to the IBT Local 863 Pension Fund.
2. The interpretation and enforcement of the collective bargaining agreement regarding pension contributions.
3. The consequences of any alleged breaches in terms of financial liabilities and obligations to the pension fund.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Argument:** The Board of Trustees argues that C S Wholesale Grocers has defaulted on its pension contributions, thereby jeopardizing the financial stability of the pension fund and violating the terms of the collective bargaining agreement. They seek recovery of unpaid contributions and potentially other damages resulting from this breach.
- **Defendant's Argument:** C S Wholesale Grocers may argue that they have complied with all requirements, disputing the claims made by the pension fund. They may also raise defenses regarding the interpretation of their obligations under the collective bargaining agreement or contest the calculation of the contributions owed.
**Outcome:**
[Provide the verdict or status of the case if known, or state that the case is still ongoing or awaiting trial.]
**Conclusion:**
This case underscores the importance of adherence to pension fund obligations under collective bargaining agreements and highlights the legal recourse available to trustees when such obligations are purportedly not met. The ruling could set a precedent for similar cases involving pension fund contributions and employer compliance.
**Note:** This summary is for informational purposes and should not be taken as legal advice. Further details about the rulings, procedural history, and specific legal citations may be required for a comprehensive understanding of the case.