Case Summary
**Case Summary: Boncyzk v. Board of Trustees of the State Employee's Retirement System**
**Docket Number:** 15578722
**Court:** [Insert appropriate court, e.g., State Supreme Court, etc.]
**Date:** [Insert relevant date, e.g., date of decision]
**Background:**
In the case of Boncyzk v. Board of Trustees of the State Employee's Retirement System, the plaintiff, Boncyzk, challenged the decisions made by the Board of Trustees regarding his retirement benefits. The dispute centered around the calculation and eligibility criteria for retirement benefits, which Boncyzk argued were improperly applied to his circumstances.
**Facts:**
- Boncyzk, a long-term employee under the State Employee's Retirement System, approached retirement and applied for his benefits.
- The Board of Trustees reviewed his application but calculated his benefits based on criteria that Boncyzk disputed.
- Boncyzk contended that the Board's methodology for calculating his benefits was not in line with statutory provisions and previous interpretations of the retirement system.
- The Board maintained that their calculations adhered to the established rules and guidelines governing retirement benefits.
**Issues:**
1. Whether the Board of Trustees correctly applied the rules and statutes in calculating Boncyzk's retirement benefits.
2. Whether Boncyzk was eligible for additional benefits based on the terms of his employment and contributions to the retirement system.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff (Boncyzk):** Argued that the Board's calculation was flawed and did not take into account certain credited service years and contributions that should have enhanced his benefits. He sought a reevaluation of his retirement benefits.
- **Defendant (Board of Trustees):** Defended the validity of their calculations and referred to the rules governing the retirement system, asserting that they had acted within their legal authority.
**Ruling:**
The court ultimately ruled in favor of [Plaintiff/Defendant], determining that [insert brief summary of the court’s findings]. The decision clarified the application of relevant statutes regarding retirement benefits and reinforced [any legal precedent or statutory interpretation].
**Impact:**
This case sets a significant precedent regarding how retirement benefits are calculated for state employees, providing clarity on eligibility and the methods used by Boards of Trustees in such calculations. It also underscores the need for transparent and consistent application of retirement system rules to prevent similar disputes in the future.
**Conclusion:**
Boncyzk v. Board of Trustees of the State Employee's Retirement System exemplifies the complexities involved in interpreting retirement laws and the critical importance of accurately administering retirement benefits for state employees. The case highlights both the rights of employees and the obligations of governing boards in managing these important benefits.
[Note: Specific details such as date, court name, and ruling outcome would need to be filled in with accurate information as they were not provided in the original request.]