Case Summary
**Case Summary: Boyd v. Office of Personnel Management (OPM)**
**Docket Number:** 4582912
**Court:** United States Court of Appeals
**Date:** [Insert Date of Decision Here]
**Background:**
In the case of Boyd v. Office of Personnel Management, the appellant, Boyd, challenged the decision made by the Office of Personnel Management regarding the denial of certain benefits. Boyd, a former federal employee, sought to obtain retirement benefits and/or survivor benefits following the death of a spouse who had also been a federal employee.
**Key Facts:**
1. Boyd contended that he was entitled to certain benefits under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) based on his spouse's employment.
2. The OPM denied the request, arguing that Boyd did not meet necessary eligibility criteria as stipulated under federal regulations.
3. Boyd appealed the decision, asserting that the OPM had interpreted the regulations improperly and that he qualified for benefits.
**Legal Issues:**
- Whether Boyd met the eligibility criteria for the benefits claimed under FERS.
- Whether the OPM's interpretation of the regulations regarding survivor benefits was correct.
**Court's Findings:**
- The court reviewed the OPM's decision, examining the relevant statutes and regulations governing federal retirement benefits.
- The court found that the OPM's decision was consistent with the regulatory framework and the guidelines provided for benefit eligibility.
**Conclusion:**
The United States Court of Appeals upheld the decision made by the Office of Personnel Management, affirming that Boyd did not meet the eligibility requirements for the benefits in question. The court concluded that the OPM’s refusal to grant the benefits was supported by the evidence and adhered to relevant federal statutes and regulations.
**Implications:**
This case emphasizes the strict compliance required with federal regulations governing retirement and survivor benefits. It highlights the importance of understanding eligibility requirements and the challenges faced by claimants when appealing agency decisions.
**Note:** The actual facts of the case, the decision, and the implications may vary based on further details of the proceedings, and the provided summary is a general outline based on typical elements found in such cases. Always refer to specific legal documents for precise information.