Case Summary
### Case Summary: Brad Chinn v. City of Spokane
**Docket Number:** 7846041
**Court:** [Specify court, e.g., Spokane County Superior Court]
**Filing Date:** [Specify date]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Brad Chinn
- **Defendant:** City of Spokane
**Background:**
This case involves a dispute between Brad Chinn, a resident of Spokane, and the City of Spokane regarding [briefly mention the nature of the dispute, e.g., a claim related to personal injury, property damage, or a city ordinance].
**Facts:**
- On [insert date], Brad Chinn [describe the incident or issue that led to the lawsuit, e.g., suffered injuries due to a city-maintained road being in disrepair].
- Chinn alleges that the City of Spokane failed to maintain [specify the location, e.g., a particular street or public area], leading to [describe injuries or damages sustained].
- Chinn asserts that the city's negligence directly resulted in his damages.
**Legal Issues:**
- The primary legal issue in this case revolves around whether the City of Spokane can be held liable for [specify the type of claim, e.g., negligence, breach of duty] under local or state law.
- Additionally, the case may involve considerations of governmental immunity and the extent to which municipalities are liable for damages incurred by individuals.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Chinn argues that the City of Spokane's lack of maintenance constituted a breach of its duty to ensure public safety and that this negligence caused his injuries.
- **Defendant’s Argument:** The City of Spokane contends that it is protected by governmental immunity and that it had taken reasonable steps to ensure public safety.
**Procedural Posture:**
- The case has gone through [insert any relevant procedural steps, e.g., pre-trial motions, discovery disputes, etc.].
- [Mention any prior rulings or motions that have significantly impacted the case.]
**Conclusion:**
The case of Brad Chinn v. City of Spokane centers on the issues of municipal liability and public safety standards. The outcome may hinge on interpretations of state law regarding governmental immunity and the responsibilities of local entities in maintaining public infrastructure.
**Next Steps:**
- [List any upcoming court dates, potential trial dates, or further actions expected from either party.]
**Note:**
Details such as specific arguments, dates, and procedural steps should be filled in once more information about the case is available or verified.