Case Summary
**Case Summary: Brandon Pegg v. Grant Herrnberger**
**Docket Number:** 4483530
**Court:** [Specify Court if available]
**Date:** [Specify Date of Proceedings]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Brandon Pegg
- **Defendant:** Grant Herrnberger
**Background:**
This case revolves around a dispute between Brandon Pegg and Grant Herrnberger, the specifics of which involve [insert brief context of the dispute - e.g., a contractual disagreement, property damage, personal injury, etc.]. The plaintiff, Brandon Pegg, is seeking relief based on [insert the basis of the claim - e.g., negligence, breach of contract, etc.]. The defendant, Grant Herrnberger, has responded to the allegations with [insert any defenses or counterclaims made by the defendant].
**Key Issues:**
1. **[Issue 1]**: [Briefly describe the first legal issue the court is addressing]
2. **[Issue 2]**: [Briefly describe the second legal issue, if applicable]
3. **[Issue 3]**: [Briefly describe any additional issues]
**Court Proceedings:**
The proceedings included [insert information on hearings, motions filed, or any procedural history relevant to the case]. Testimonies from [insert names of key witnesses, if any] were provided to support both the plaintiff's and defendant’s claims.
**Judgment:**
The court ultimately [describe the court's ruling – e.g., found in favor of the plaintiff, awarded damages, dismissed the case, etc.]. The ruling addressed the key issues as follows:
- **[Issue 1 Result]**: [Explain how the court ruled on this issue]
- **[Issue 2 Result]**: [Explain how the court ruled on this issue]
- **[Issue 3 Result]**: [Explain how the court ruled on this issue]
**Conclusion:**
The case of Brandon Pegg v. Grant Herrnberger illustrates [insert any lessons learned, implications for precedent, or significance]. This case may have implications for future disputes involving [insert relevant area of law].
**Next Steps:**
Following the judgment, [insert any appeals, further court dates, or actions required by either party].
(Note: Always verify specific details based on the case records and jurisdictional requirements.)