Legal Case Summary

Bretta Pollara v. Radiant Logistics, Inc.


Date Argued: Mon May 02 2016
Case Number: 14-56025
Docket Number: 3060165
Judges:Pregerson, Bybee, N.R. Smith
Duration: 46 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Bretta Pollara v. Radiant Logistics, Inc.** **Docket Number: 3060165** **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date Filed:** [Insert Date] **Judge:** [Insert Judge's Name] **Background:** This case involves Bretta Pollara (Plaintiff) filing a lawsuit against Radiant Logistics, Inc. (Defendant), alleging [briefly outline the nature of the claim, e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, breach of contract, etc.]. The Plaintiff contends that [details regarding the incident or behavior by the defendant that led to the lawsuit, including relevant dates and events]. **Claims:** The Plaintiff asserts several claims against the Defendant, including but not limited to: 1. [Claim 1: e.g., violation of labor laws] 2. [Claim 2: e.g., discrimination based on race, gender, etc.] 3. [Any additional claims made] **Facts:** - **Employment Background:** [Describe Plaintiff's role with the company, duration of employment, and any relevant performance history.] - **Incident Details:** [Outline the key events leading to the lawsuit, specifying dates, actions taken by both parties, and any communications relevant to the dispute.] - **Actions Taken:** [Detail any complaints made by the Plaintiff or investigations initiated in response to the alleged misconduct.] **Defendant’s Position:** Radiant Logistics, Inc. denies the allegations made by Pollara and asserts that [provide a summary of the defense's arguments, such as justification for actions taken, rebuttals to claims made, and any relevant evidence offered in defense]. **Procedural History:** - [Summarize any significant motions filed, hearings held, or rulings made by the court.] - [Indicate whether the case is proceeding to trial, settled, or if any alternative dispute resolution methods are being pursued.] **Conclusion:** This case represents a significant legal confrontation between Bretta Pollara and Radiant Logistics, Inc., centering on [summarize the key issue or contention]. The outcome will hinge on [specify any key legal questions, application of relevant laws, or parties' credibility]. As the proceedings continue, the implications of this case could affect [detail any potential impact on the parties or broader implications for employment law, corporate practices, etc.]. **Next Steps:** - [Outline the next steps in the litigation process, such as further hearings, discovery deadlines, or potential dates for trial.] (Note: Specific details regarding the court’s rulings, evidence presented, and other case-specific information would need to be included for a more complete case summary, as they are not provided in the initial request.)

Bretta Pollara v. Radiant Logistics, Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available