Legal Case Summary

Broderick Seay, Jr. v. Al Cannon


Date Argued: Tue Jan 29 2019
Case Number: 18-7242
Docket Number: 14527132
Judges:Paul V. Niemeyer, Barbara Milano Keenan, A. Marvin Quattlebaum Jr.
Duration: 44 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Broderick Seay, Jr. v. Al Cannon** **Docket Number:** 14527132 **Court:** (Specify the court if known, e.g., Circuit Court, District Court, etc.) **Date:** (Specify the relevant dates if known) **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Broderick Seay, Jr. - **Defendant:** Al Cannon **Background:** This case involves the plaintiff, Broderick Seay, Jr., who is bringing legal action against the defendant, Al Cannon. The specifics of the dispute have not been detailed, but given the context of the parties involved, the case likely pertains to issues such as civil rights, law enforcement conduct, or personal injury. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues at hand may include allegations of unlawful actions by the defendant, which could encompass claims under civil rights statutes or state law. The nature of the complaint brought forth by Seay is essential to understanding the claims and defenses presented in the case. **Procedural History:** The case has progressed through the legal system and is now at a stage where it is being adjudicated. Details regarding motions filed, hearings held, or rulings issued would typically be included here to provide context on how the case has unfolded. **Key Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Broderick Seay, Jr. claims that Al Cannon acted in a manner that violated his rights, potentially involving wrongful actions related to law enforcement or negligence. - **Defendant’s Argument:** Al Cannon may argue that his actions were justified under the law, asserting defenses that challenge the plaintiff's claims. **Outcome:** (As this is a hypothetical case summary, outcomes should be provided based on known details or left general if unknown at this time.) **Conclusion:** The case of Broderick Seay, Jr. v. Al Cannon raises significant legal questions regarding personal rights and responsibilities, particularly in the context of law enforcement. The resolution of this case could impact relevant legal standards and practices. **Note:** This summary is a generic template and should be tailored with specific details about the case, which can include evidence presented, testimonies, legal precedents cited, and specific rulings made by the court. Please insert specific details wherever necessary.

Broderick Seay, Jr. v. Al Cannon


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available