Legal Case Summary

Bruce Rafford v. Snohomish County


Date Argued: Fri Oct 16 2009
Case Number: 08-35884
Docket Number: 7848865
Judges:Burns, Rawlinson, Callahan
Duration: 25 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Bruce Rafford v. Snohomish County** **Docket Number:** 7848865 **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., Superior Court of Washington for Snohomish County] **Filing Date:** [Insert filing date] **Case Overview:** In the case of Bruce Rafford v. Snohomish County, the plaintiff, Bruce Rafford, initiated a legal action against Snohomish County, challenging specific actions or regulations imposed by the county that Rafford argued were unlawful or detrimental to his interests. **Key Issues:** 1. **Legal Grounds:** The case revolves around [specify the legal grounds—e.g., constitutional violations, property rights, administrative law]. 2. **Response from Snohomish County:** The county's defense included [summarize the county's arguments or legal defenses used in response to Rafford's claims]. 3. **Relief Sought:** Rafford sought [describe the relief sought, such as monetary damages, injunctive relief, or a declaratory judgment]. **Procedural History:** - The case was filed on [insert date]. - Initial motions and pleadings were exchanged, including [summarize significant motions or rulings, such as motions to dismiss or for summary judgment]. - [Describe any key hearings or decisions, including dates]. **Ruling:** As of the latest update, the court ruled in favor of [insert outcome – either Rafford or Snohomish County], finding that [summarize the court's reasoning or rationale behind the decision]. **Implications:** This case is significant because [discuss the broader implications of the ruling for local governance, property rights, or relevant laws]. The ruling may influence future cases involving county regulations and individual rights within Snohomish County. **Next Steps:** Following the court's decision, either party may seek to appeal the ruling or pursue further legal remedies, depending on the outcomes of ongoing litigation or negotiations. **Conclusion:** The case of Bruce Rafford v. Snohomish County underscores important legal principles regarding [summarize the relevant principles, such as administrative law, civil rights, or local government authority]. The legal proceedings are ongoing, with potential further developments anticipated. --- *Note: For specific details on dates, rulings, and legal grounds, refer to case filings or legal databases.*

Bruce Rafford v. Snohomish County


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available