Case Summary
**Case Summary: Buckner v. University Park Police Pension Fund**
**Docket Number:** 3086047
**Court:** [Specify Court, if known]
**Date:** [Specify Date, if known]
**Overview:**
The case of Buckner v. University Park Police Pension Fund centers around a dispute involving pension entitlement and related benefits for an employee of the University Park Police Department.
**Facts:**
- The plaintiff, Buckner, was a former police officer who contributed to the University Park Police Pension Fund during his employment.
- After his retirement, Buckner filed for pension benefits, which he believed he was entitled to based on his years of service and contributions made to the pension fund.
- The University Park Police Pension Fund, however, denied Buckner’s claim, citing specific provisions of the pension plan that they argued did not support his eligibility for the benefits he sought.
**Issues:**
1. Did the University Park Police Pension Fund improperly deny Buckner’s claim for pension benefits?
2. Were the provisions cited by the pension fund validly applied in this case?
3. What are the legal standards governing the obligations of pension funds in relation to their beneficiaries?
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff’s Argument (Buckner):** Buckner argued that he had fulfilled all requirements for retirement benefits according to the pension plan’s terms and that the fund’s denial was unfounded and contrary to its own policies.
- **Defendant’s Argument (Pension Fund):** The pension fund contended that Buckner did not meet certain eligibility criteria as defined in the plan, and therefore, was not entitled to the benefits he was claiming.
**Outcome:**
The case was ultimately resolved in court, with a ruling that addressed the legality of the pension fund’s denial of benefits. The Court’s decision evaluated the terms of the pension plan and the conduct of both parties in relation to the retirement benefits in question.
**Significance:**
This case highlights the complexities involved in pension fund administration and the importance of clear communication regarding eligibility and entitlements. It reiterates the need for pension funds to apply plan terms consistently and equitably among beneficiaries.
**Conclusion:**
The Buckner v. University Park Police Pension Fund serves as a critical reference point for similar disputes concerning pension entitlements and the administrative responsibilities of pension funds regarding their beneficiaries.
(Note: For more detailed legal analysis, specific dates, court rulings, and implications for future cases can be added based on access to full court documents.)