Legal Case Summary

Burnett v. Resurgent Capital Services


Date Argued: Thu Dec 08 2005
Case Number: 04-15503
Docket Number: 7857109
Judges:Trott, T.G. Nelson, Paez
Duration: 18 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Burnett v. Resurgent Capital Services** **Docket Number:** 7857109 **Court:** [Specify court if known, e.g., United States District Court, [District Name]] **Date:** [Specify date if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Burnett - **Defendant:** Resurgent Capital Services **Background:** The case of Burnett v. Resurgent Capital Services involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Mr. Burnett, and the defendant, Resurgent Capital Services, a company engaged in debt collection. The plaintiff alleges that Resurgent Capital Services violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) through various unlawful collection practices. **Key Issues:** 1. **Allegations of Misconduct:** The plaintiff claims that the defendant employed unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices in the collection of debts, which is contrary to the provisions set out in the FDCPA. 2. **Impact on the Plaintiff:** Mr. Burnett asserts that the actions of Resurgent Capital Services caused him emotional distress, damages to his credit rating, and financial harm. **Legal Arguments:** - The plaintiff's legal team argues that the actions taken by Resurgent Capital Services constitute a clear violation of consumer protection laws as outlined in the FDCPA. They seek compensatory and possibly punitive damages for the alleged misconduct. - The defendant, Resurgent Capital Services, may argue that their collection practices were within legal bounds and that they adhered to the guidelines set by the FDCPA. **Outcome:** [If known, summarize the court's ruling, potential settlement, or any other relevant outcome. If the case is ongoing or unresolved, indicate that as well.] **Significance:** This case is significant as it addresses the boundaries of debt collection practices under federal law. The outcome could establish important precedents regarding the rights of consumers and the responsibilities of debt collectors in their collection efforts. **Next Steps:** - [Indicate any future proceedings if known, such as hearings, mediation, or scheduled court dates.] (Note: Specific details regarding dates, court, or outcomes would need to be filled in as per the actual case development; this summary is a general template based on common legal issues associated with debt collection cases.)

Burnett v. Resurgent Capital Services


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available