Legal Case Summary

Cal-Agrex, Inc. v. Dee Van Tassell


Date Argued: Wed Nov 03 2010
Case Number: 09-15998
Docket Number: 7846799
Judges:England, Gould, Callahan
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Cal-Agrex, Inc. v. Dee Van Tassell** **Docket Number:** 7846799 **Court:** [Insert the appropriate court, if known] **Date:** [Insert the relevant date, if known] **Background:** Cal-Agrex, Inc., a corporation engaged in agricultural products, initiated legal proceedings against Dee Van Tassell. The case arises from a dispute concerning [insert specific nature of the dispute, e.g., breach of contract, payment issues, etc.]. **Facts:** 1. **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Cal-Agrex, Inc. - **Defendant:** Dee Van Tassell 2. **Nature of the Dispute:** - The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to fulfill obligations outlined in an agreement related to [insert details about the contract or agreement]. - The plaintiff alleges that as a result of the defendant's actions, they suffered financial and operational damages. 3. **Claims Made:** - The plaintiff's claims include [insert specific claims, e.g., breach of contract, damages, etc.]. **Procedural History:** - The plaintiff filed a complaint on [insert filing date] seeking [insert relief sought, e.g., monetary damages, specific performance, etc.]. - The defendant responded on [insert response date], denying the allegations and possibly asserting counterclaims or defenses. **Issues:** - The key legal issues to be resolved include: 1. Whether the defendant breached the terms of the agreement. 2. The extent of damages incurred by the plaintiff due to the alleged breach. 3. Any defenses raised by the defendant. **Outcome:** - [Insert any available information on the outcome of the case, such as verdicts, settlements, or ongoing status.] **Significance:** - This case highlights important aspects of contract law within the agricultural industry and sets a precedent for future disputes involving similar contractual obligations. **Conclusion:** The case of Cal-Agrex, Inc. v. Dee Van Tassell demonstrates the complexities involved in agricultural contracts and emphasizes the importance of compliance with contractual terms to avoid litigation. **Note:** Further details regarding the ongoing proceedings, legal arguments, and potential appeals may provide additional clarity on this case as it evolves. --- Please fill in the placeholders with specific information if it is available or modify any sections to better fit the known parameters of the case.

Cal-Agrex, Inc. v. Dee Van Tassell


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available