Case Summary
**Case Summary: Calhoun v. Secretary Pennsylvania Board of Probation, Docket Number 3014819**
**Court:** Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
**Judge:** [Judge's Name]
**Date:** [Date of Ruling]
**Background:**
The case of Calhoun v. Secretary Pennsylvania Board of Probation revolves around the appellant, Calhoun, challenging the decision of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation regarding his probation status. The specifics of the case include allegations that the Board failed to adhere to statutory guidelines in its proceedings, which ultimately impacted Calhoun’s rights and due process during the probation review process.
**Facts:**
- Calhoun was placed on probation following a conviction for [specify the crime, if applicable].
- The Board reportedly did not provide adequate notice of the proceedings related to Calhoun's probation status.
- Calhoun alleged that the Board's actions effectively violated his due process rights under both state law and applicable constitutional protections.
**Issue:**
The central issue in this case is whether the Pennsylvania Board of Probation conducted a fair and lawful review of Calhoun’s probation status in accordance with statutory requirements, and whether any failure to do so constituted a violation of his due process rights.
**Arguments:**
- **For Calhoun (Appellant):**
- Calhoun's counsel argued that the Board did not follow established protocols which deprived him of the opportunity to adequately defend himself or present mitigating evidence during the probation review.
- Emphasis was placed on the necessity of proper notice and the right to a fair hearing as fundamental components of due process.
- **For the Pennsylvania Board of Probation (Appellee):**
- The Board maintained that they acted within the bounds of their authority and that any deviations from the procedure did not significantly prejudice Calhoun’s position.
- They argued that the overall objectives of the probation system were met, and therefore no legal violation occurred.
**Ruling:**
The court [made a determination/concluded] that [summarize the court's ruling]. It was determined that [insert key findings related to whether the court found in favor of Calhoun, the Board, or reached a settlement].
**Conclusion:**
The outcome of Calhoun v. Secretary Pennsylvania Board of Probation has implications for how probation hearings are conducted in Pennsylvania, particularly regarding the enforcement of due process rights. The ruling reaffirms the necessity for procedural fairness in administrative hearings and the importance of adhering to statutory mandates in the management of probation cases.
**Significance:**
This case serves as a precedent for similar cases involving probation proceedings, emphasizing the critical nature of due process and the requirements for notification and fair hearings within the correctional system.
---
Please note: The judge's name, specific dates, and details of the ruling were left blank and would need to be filled with accurate information to provide a complete summary.