Legal Case Summary

Callie Maidhof v. Mitchell Celaya


Date Argued: Wed Nov 18 2015
Case Number: 93-4188
Docket Number: 3014168
Judges:Parker, McKeown, Rawlinson
Duration: 34 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

### Case Summary: Callie Maidhof v. Mitchell Celaya **Docket Number:** 3014168 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Date of Case Decision] **Judge:** [Insert Judge's Name] **Parties:** - Plaintiff: Callie Maidhof - Defendant: Mitchell Celaya #### Background: Callie Maidhof filed a lawsuit against Mitchell Celaya regarding a dispute that arose from [insert brief background of the case, such as the nature of the relationship between the parties, the events leading up to the lawsuit, and any relevant contractual or legal obligations]. #### Issues: The primary legal issues at stake in the case involved [list key issues such as breach of contract, negligence, property disputes, etc.]. The plaintiff alleged that [summarize plaintiff’s claims and the relief sought], while the defendant [summarize defendant’s response or counterclaims]. #### Arguments: - **Plaintiff's Arguments:** Maidhof's legal team argued that [summarize key arguments and evidence presented by the plaintiff, including witness testimonies, documents, or other evidence]. - **Defendant's Arguments:** Celaya's defense countered by asserting that [summarize the main defenses and evidence presented by the defendant]. #### Court's Analysis: The court reviewed the evidence presented by both parties, focusing on [describe the critical aspects the court considered, such as credibility of witnesses, applicability of laws, precedents cited, etc.]. The judge also considered [mention any specific legal standards or precedents that were significant in the case]. #### Decision: The court ruled in favor of [the plaintiff or the defendant], finding that [summarize the key findings and the rationale behind the court's decision]. The court ordered [mention any remedies, damages, injunctions, or orders issued by the court]. #### Conclusion: This case highlights [discuss the implications of the court's ruling, including any potential legal precedents established, impact on the parties involved, and broader relevance to similar cases]. [Add any additional relevant information or notes regarding the appeal process, if applicable.] --- **Note:** For specific details about the legal arguments, findings, and implications of the case, you should consult the actual court documents or legal records associated with Docket Number 3014168.

Callie Maidhof v. Mitchell Celaya


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available