Case Summary
**Case Summary: Calvin Whiting v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.**
**Docket Number:** 3007194
**Court:** [Insert court name, if known]
**Date:** [Insert relevant date]
**Parties:**
- **Plaintiff:** Calvin Whiting
- **Defendant:** Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
**Case Background:**
Calvin Whiting, the plaintiff, filed a lawsuit against Wexford Health Sources, Inc., alleging violations related to inadequate medical care while in custody. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. is a private healthcare provider that contracts to provide medical services to correctional facilities.
**Key Issues:**
1. **Medical Negligence:** The plaintiff contended that Wexford Health Sources failed to provide adequate medical treatment for his health issues during his time in custody.
2. **Deliberate Indifference:** Whiting claimed that the medical staff’s actions demonstrated deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, which is a standard that must be met in Section 1983 claims against state actors.
**Facts of the Case:**
- Calvin Whiting was incarcerated at a facility managed by Wexford Health Sources.
- The plaintiff alleged that he experienced significant health problems that went untreated or were improperly treated by the medical staff.
- Whiting filed grievances regarding his treatment, which he claimed were ignored or inadequately addressed by Wexford Health.
- The case examined whether Wexford Health acted with negligence or if there was a failure to uphold constitutional standards regarding inmate healthcare.
**Legal Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Whiting maintained that Wexford Health’s failure to provide necessary medical care constituted a violation of his Eighth Amendment rights, which protect against cruel and unusual punishment.
- **Defendant’s Argument:** Wexford Health Sources argued that they provided adequate medical care and that any alleged delays or issues did not rise to the level of constitutional violations.
**Outcome:**
The court's decision in this case would hinge upon the assessment of the standard of care provided by Wexford Health and whether it met the constitutional obligations towards inmates. [Insert details regarding verdict or ruling, if known.]
**Significance:**
This case highlights the responsibilities of healthcare providers in correctional settings and sets a precedent regarding the level of care required to satisfy constitutional protections for inmates.
**Next Steps:**
[Outline any appeals, further legal actions, or ongoing proceedings related to the case, if applicable.]
(Note: Specific details such as dates, court names, and outcomes need to be personalized based on the actual case record, which may not be publicly available.)