Legal Case Summary

Camelot Inc. v. Burke Burns & Pinelli Ltd.


Date Argued: Wed Oct 04 2017
Case Number: 2-17-0038
Docket Number: 6163810
Judges:Not available
Duration: 38 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Camelot Inc. v. Burke Burns & Pinelli Ltd. - Docket Number 6163810** **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Camelot Inc. - **Defendant:** Burke Burns & Pinelli Ltd. **Background:** Camelot Inc. initiated this case against Burke Burns & Pinelli Ltd. regarding a business dispute that arose from a contractual relationship between the two parties. Camelot Inc., a company specializing in [insert nature of business], claimed that the defendant breached the contract by [insert specific breach details], leading to [insert consequences, e.g., financial loss, operational disruption]. **Key Issues:** 1. Whether Burke Burns & Pinelli Ltd. breached the terms of the contract with Camelot Inc. 2. The extent of damages incurred by Camelot Inc. as a result of the alleged breach. 3. The applicability of any defenses raised by Burke Burns & Pinelli Ltd. **Court’s Findings:** The court carefully examined the evidence presented, including the contract details, communications between the parties, and any witness testimonies. It was determined that Burke Burns & Pinelli Ltd. failed to adhere to the stipulated terms of the contract, specifically in [detail the specific provisions of the contract that were breached]. Regarding damages, the court found that Camelot Inc. had indeed suffered [quantify financial or operational damages], supporting their claim for restitution. The defendant's defenses were considered, but the court concluded that they were insufficient to negate the breach of contract claim. **Conclusion:** The court ruled in favor of Camelot Inc., finding that Burke Burns & Pinelli Ltd. breached the contract and that Camelot is entitled to [insert any awarded damages, specific performance, or other remedies]. The ruling emphasized the importance of contract adherence and held Burke Burns & Pinelli Ltd. accountable for their failure to fulfill their obligations. **Significance:** This case reaffirms the legal principle that parties must adhere to contractual obligations and highlights the recourse available to aggrieved parties when breaches occur. **End of Summary** (Note: The content should be adapted and further detailed based on the actual case information available since the specific details about the case were not provided.)

Camelot Inc. v. Burke Burns & Pinelli Ltd.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available