Legal Case Summary

Carol Peterson v. C. R. Bard, Incorporated


Date Argued: Tue Apr 26 2016
Case Number: 15-30743
Docket Number: 3058163
Judges:Not available
Duration: 36 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Carol Peterson v. C.R. Bard, Incorporated** **Docket Number:** 3058163 **Court:** [Specify Court if available] **Date:** [Specify Date if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Carol Peterson - **Defendant:** C.R. Bard, Incorporated **Background:** Carol Peterson filed a lawsuit against C.R. Bard, Incorporated, a medical device manufacturer, alleging that the company’s products caused her injury. The case revolves around claims related to the design, manufacturing, and marketing of the defendant's products, specifically focusing on their safety and efficacy. **Claims:** The plaintiff asserted several legal claims, including: - Product liability - Negligence - Breach of warranty - Failure to warn **Facts:** - The plaintiff underwent a medical procedure where a device manufactured by C.R. Bard was used. - Post-procedure, the plaintiff experienced complications which she attributes directly to the product. - The plaintiff alleges that C.R. Bard failed to adequately warn healthcare providers and patients about the potential risks associated with the product. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case pertain to: 1. The adequacy of the product warnings provided by C.R. Bard. 2. Whether the design of the product was defective and unreasonably dangerous. 3. The applicability of state and federal regulations regarding medical device safety. **Court Proceedings:** The case proceeded through pretrial motions, discovery, and possibly settlement negotiations before trial. The plaintiff sought compensatory damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and any other related damages, while the defendant sought to dismiss the claims based on arguments regarding product approval and compliance with regulatory standards. **Outcome:** [Specify the case outcome if available, e.g., verdict in favor of plaintiff/defendant, settlement reached, etc. If information is not available, state "The outcome of the case is pending."] **Significance:** This case is significant as it addresses critical issues related to product liability in the medical device industry, particularly the responsibilities of manufacturers in informing patients and medical professionals about potential risks. **Note:** For detailed information regarding the case, including citations or specific court findings, further legal research may be necessary.

Carol Peterson v. C. R. Bard, Incorporated


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available