Legal Case Summary

Carole Coppinger-Martin v. Hilda Solis


Date Argued: Fri Oct 08 2010
Case Number: 09-73725
Docket Number: 7846932
Judges:Collins, Thomas, Smith M.
Duration: 24 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Carole Coppinger-Martin v. Hilda Solis** **Docket Number:** 7846932 **Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., U.S. District Court, D.C., etc.] **Date:** [Specify the decision date or relevant dates if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Carole Coppinger-Martin - **Defendant:** Hilda Solis, in her capacity as [Specific Role, e.g., Secretary of Labor] **Background:** Carole Coppinger-Martin filed a lawsuit against Hilda Solis, claiming [briefly describe the nature of the lawsuit, e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, violation of rights, etc.]. The case stems from events that occurred on [provide context or timeline of events leading up to the lawsuit, including any relevant actions taken by the defendant]. **Legal Issues:** The central legal issues in this case involved: - [Examine specific laws or regulations cited, such as employment laws, discrimination statutes, administrative procedures, etc.] - [Discuss any claims made by the plaintiff, such as violation of federal law, administrative procedures, or other relevant legal standards.] **Procedural History:** - The case was filed in [state the court where the case was filed]. - [Describe the progression of the case, including any motions filed, hearings held, or decisions made prior to the final judgment if applicable.] **Court's Findings:** The court examined [discuss evidence presented, testimonies, and any relevant documentation]. It concluded that [summarize the court’s ruling, outlining any findings of fact and conclusions of law]. **Outcome:** The court ruled in favor of [indicate whether the plaintiff or defendant won the case], finding that [briefly explain the court's rationale for its decision]. The ruling led to [discuss any orders made by the court, such as reinstatement, monetary damages, policy changes, etc.]. **Significance:** This case is significant as it addresses [explain any broader implications of the case, such as how it may impact future legal standards, workplace regulations, etc.]. The decision may influence [speculate on potential influences on similar future cases or legal interpretations]. **Conclusion:** Carole Coppinger-Martin v. Hilda Solis highlights important issues surrounding [reiterate key issues addressed in the case]. The outcome demonstrates [summarize the broader implications or lessons learned from the case]. --- *Note: This summary is a general template and should be supplemented with specific details from the actual case file or decision for accuracy.*

Carole Coppinger-Martin v. Hilda Solis


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available