Legal Case Summary

CARRILLO-TORRES v. GONZALES


Date Argued: Thu Feb 09 2006
Case Number: 03-72952
Docket Number: 7856916
Judges:Thompson, T. Nelson, Gould.
Duration: 22 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

Case Summary: Carrillo-Torres v. Gonzales, Docket Number 7856916 **Court:** [Court Name] **Date:** [Date of Decision] **Judges:** [Judges Involved] **Parties Involved:** - **Petitioner:** Carrillo-Torres - **Respondent:** Gonzales, in his capacity as [specific role, e.g., Attorney General] **Background:** Carrillo-Torres, the petitioner, challenged a decision made by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) regarding his immigration status. The case arose from the petitioner's claim for relief under [specific immigration law or policy], which was denied by DHS, leading to subsequent appeal to the court. **Facts:** - Carrillo-Torres is a [nationality or background] individual facing removal proceedings. - The core of the dispute revolves around [specific facts regarding Carrillo-Torres's immigration history, reasons for application, and any previous legal actions]. - The primary argument presented by Carrillo-Torres was [summarize the legal basis for the petition, including any claims for asylum, withholding of removal, or other forms of relief]. **Legal Issues:** - The main legal issues included [list the key legal issues being addressed, such as the interpretation of immigration laws, procedural fairness, or specific eligibility criteria for relief]. - The court also considered [any important precedents or legal standards applicable to the case]. **Decision:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of [Petitioner/Respondent], holding that [summarize the court's findings and reasoning]. The court [upheld/reversed] the DHS decision, emphasizing [key points in the ruling, such as deficiencies in the DHS’s analysis or the validity of Carrillo-Torres's claims]. **Implications:** This decision carries significant implications for [mention broader impacts on immigration policy, individual rights, or the legal landscape]. The ruling serves as a precedent for similar cases involving [relevant factors or issues] and highlights the ongoing challenges faced by individuals in immigration proceedings. **Conclusion:** The case of Carrillo-Torres v. Gonzales underscores the complexities of immigration law and the importance of judicial oversight in ensuring fair treatment within the legal framework. The court’s decision not only affects the petitioner but also contributes to the evolving interpretation of immigration policies in the United States. (Note: For complete accuracy, insert specific details such as the name of the court, the exact date of the decision, and any other relevant information where brackets are placed.)

CARRILLO-TORRES v. GONZALES


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available