Legal Case Summary

Catherine Mays v. King County


Date Argued: Wed Oct 14 2009
Case Number: 08-35762
Docket Number: 7848893
Judges:Cudahy, Rawlinson, Callahan
Duration: 30 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Catherine Mays v. King County** **Docket Number:** 7848893 **Court:** [Insert appropriate court name, e.g., King County Superior Court] **Filing Date:** [Insert filing date] **Background:** Catherine Mays filed a lawsuit against King County, alleging [briefly outline the nature of the claim, e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, personal injury, etc.]. The case arose from incidents that occurred on [insert relevant dates or time frame], involving [provide a concise description of the events leading to the lawsuit]. **Claims:** Mays' complaint included the following claims against King County: 1. **[Claim 1]:** [Brief description of the first claim, e.g., "Violation of employment rights"] 2. **[Claim 2]:** [Brief description of the second claim, e.g., "Discrimination based on gender/race/age"] 3. **[Claim 3]:** [Any additional claims if applicable] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments:** Mays maintained that King County violated her rights by [insert key arguments, such as failing to provide adequate workplace protections, discriminatory practices, etc.]. She provided evidence in the form of [mention any relevant documents, witness testimonies, or other evidence]. - **Defendant's Arguments:** King County responded by [briefly explain the defense’s response, e.g., denying the allegations, providing justifications for actions taken, etc.]. The defense argued that [summarize the key points of the defense’s case]. **Outcome:** The case was resolved via [indicate how the case was resolved, such as trial verdict, settlement, dismissal]. The court ruled in favor of [Mays or King County] and [briefly summarize the court's decision or settlement terms, if applicable]. **Significance:** This case highlights [discuss the broader implications, such as workplace rights, discrimination issues, or any legal precedents set]. It serves as a noteworthy example of [insert any lessons learned or relevant takeaways]. **Conclusion:** The verdict in Catherine Mays v. King County underscores the importance of [relevant legal principles or societal issues] in employment law disputes. The outcome may influence future cases involving similar claims within King County and beyond. --- Please replace placeholders with specific details related to the case to complete the summary.

Catherine Mays v. King County


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available