Legal Case Summary

Cecil Smith v. ICTSI Oregon, Inc.


Date Argued: Fri May 11 2018
Case Number: 16-35242
Docket Number: 6663711
Judges:Rawlinson, Christen, Block
Duration: 30 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Cecil Smith v. ICTSI Oregon, Inc.** **Docket Number:** 6663711 **Court:** [Insert relevant court or jurisdiction, if known] **Date:** [Insert date of the decision, if known] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Cecil Smith - **Defendant:** ICTSI Oregon, Inc. **Background:** Cecil Smith filed a lawsuit against ICTSI Oregon, Inc., a company involved in the operation of terminal services at the Port of Portland. The case arises from allegations made by Smith against the company pertaining to [insert any pertinent details about the basis of the claim, such as employment issues, workplace safety, contract disputes, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case revolve around [insert brief description of the legal issues, such as wrongful termination, discrimination, breach of contract, negligence, etc.]. Smith alleges that [provide key allegations made by the plaintiff against ICTSI Oregon, Inc.], which he contends violated applicable laws or regulations. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Cecil Smith contends that [summarize the plaintiff’s arguments]. He seeks [clarify the relief sought by the plaintiff, such as damages, reinstatement, etc.]. - **Defendant's Argument:** ICTSI Oregon, Inc. denies the allegations and argues that [summarize the defendant’s counterarguments]. They contend that [provide the basis for the defendant's position and any defenses raised, such as lack of merit, compliance with regulations, etc.]. **Ruling:** The court's ruling in this case [summarize the outcome of the case, including any judgments, dismissals, or orders]. The court found that [insert key findings or legal standards applied], ultimately deciding in favor of [either the plaintiff or defendant]. **Conclusion:** This case serves as a significant examination of [insert any implications of the case, such as legal precedents, workplace regulations, or industry standards]. The ruling underscores [discuss any broader implications or issues highlighted by the case, such as employer responsibilities, workers’ rights, etc.]. **Note:** This summary is based on the limited information available regarding the case Cecil Smith v. ICTSI Oregon, Inc. For more detailed information, further legal documents or court records should be consulted.

Cecil Smith v. ICTSI Oregon, Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available