Case Summary
**Case Summary: Cedarhurst of Bethalto Real Estate, LLC v. Village of Bethalto**
**Docket Number:** 6347220
**Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., Circuit Court of [County], Illinois]
**Date:** [Insert relevant dates]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Cedarhurst of Bethalto Real Estate, LLC
- **Defendant:** Village of Bethalto
**Background:**
Cedarhurst of Bethalto Real Estate, LLC initiated this case against the Village of Bethalto over issues related to zoning, land use, or licensing pertaining to a proposed development project. The plaintiff sought to establish their rights concerning the intended use of property located within the village and contested specific regulatory decisions made by the village.
**Facts:**
1. Cedarhurst of Bethalto Real Estate, LLC proposed a development project (details of the project, e.g., an assisted living facility) within the Village of Bethalto.
2. The Village of Bethalto took action (e.g., zoning changes, building permits, etc.) that impacted Cedarhurst’s ability to develop the property as intended.
3. Cedarhurst alleged that the actions of the Village were unjustified and violated their rights, possibly citing statutory or constitutional grounds.
4. The Village of Bethalto defended its positions, asserting that its actions were in line with local zoning ordinances and necessary for community planning.
**Legal Issues:**
- The primary legal issues included questions regarding zoning authority, compliance with municipal regulations, and any potential overreach by the village in denying or restricting the proposed development.
**Argued Points:**
- Cedarhurst argued that the village’s actions were unreasonable and obstructed a legitimate development project that would benefit the community.
- The Village contended that it had a responsibility to regulate land use to ensure the well-being of its residents and that its decisions were within the scope of its legal authority.
**Outcome:**
[Insert the decision of the court, whether it was in favor of Cedarhurst or the Village, and any specific rulings that were made regarding the zoning or land use laws in question. If an appeal was involved, include that information as well.]
**Implications:**
The outcome of this case may set a precedent for future land use and zoning disputes within the Village of Bethalto and potentially impact similar cases in neighboring jurisdictions. It highlights the balance between private development rights and municipal regulatory authority.
**Conclusion:**
The Cedarhurst of Bethalto Real Estate, LLC v. Village of Bethalto case illustrates ongoing tensions between developers and local governments regarding property development and land use regulation. The case serves as a significant point of reference for those navigating the complexities of real estate development within municipal frameworks.
[Note: Ensure to verify and insert any specific details and outcomes from the actual case, as this summary is a general template and does not reflect actual case information.]