Legal Case Summary

Cesar Rosas v. Catholic Archbishop of Seattle


Date Argued: Wed Sep 22 2010
Case Number: 09-35003eb
Docket Number: 7847085
Judges:Hearing Panel: Beezer, Gould, Tallman en Banc Panel: Kozinski, Pregerson, Beezer, O'scannlain, Graber, Fisher, Gould, Tallman, Bea, Smith M., Smith N. R.
Duration: 63 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Cesar Rosas v. Catholic Archbishop of Seattle** **Docket Number:** 7847085 **Court:** [Court Name] **Date:** [Date of Filing/Decision] **Judges:** [Judge Names] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Cesar Rosas - **Defendant:** Catholic Archbishop of Seattle **Background:** Cesar Rosas, the plaintiff, filed a lawsuit against the Catholic Archbishop of Seattle, alleging [briefly state the nature of the complaint, e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, etc.]. The case was brought forward in response to circumstances involving [provide relevant details about the events leading to the case, such as employment context, specific incidents, or policies in place]. **Legal Issues:** The main legal issues presented in this case include: 1. [First Legal Issue: e.g., whether the actions of the defendant constituted discrimination under state/federal law] 2. [Second Legal Issue: e.g., any violation of employment contracts or church policies] 3. [Additional Legal Issues: as appropriate] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Arguments:** - Cesar Rosas contended that [summarize the key arguments presented by Rosas, supported by evidence such as testimonies, documents, or previous case law]. - The plaintiff asserted that his rights were violated through [detail any relevant laws or regulations invoked]. - **Defendant’s Arguments:** - The Catholic Archbishop of Seattle argued that [summarize the defense's position, including any justifications or defenses against the claims]. - They maintained that any actions taken were [explain reasons such as compliance with church policies, lack of merit in claims, or other relevant defenses]. **Court’s Decision:** The court ruled in favor of [one party or the other], concluding that [summarize the court's findings and rationale behind the ruling]. The decision was based on [discuss any significant evidence or legal precedent that influenced the court's decision]. **Outcome:** - The court's ruling included [briefly detail any remedies awarded, such as damages, reinstatement, apology, policy changes, etc.]. - The decision established [mention any broader implications or precedents set by the case, if applicable]. **Conclusion:** This case highlights issues regarding [summarize the key topics addressed, such as workplace rights, religious organization policies, or discrimination law]. Future implications may involve [discuss potential longer-term effects on similar cases or policies within related organizations]. (Note: This summary is a template and may need actual case details filled in for a complete and accurate representation. Please ensure that all legal citations are verified for accuracy per the latest case law and the specific court’s rulings.)

Cesar Rosas v. Catholic Archbishop of Seattle


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available