Case Summary
**Case Summary: Charde Evans v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.**
**Docket Number:** 4109282
**Court:** [Insert relevant court information, e.g., State Court, Federal Court]
**Date Filed:** [Insert date]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Charde Evans
- **Defendant:** Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
**Facts of the Case:**
Charde Evans, the plaintiff, filed a lawsuit against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., alleging [insert specific claims such as negligence, premises liability, discrimination, etc.]. The incident leading to this case occurred on [insert date], when Evans [describe the incident briefly, e.g., slipped and fell, was injured in an accident, etc.], while shopping at a Wal-Mart location.
The plaintiff claims that Wal-Mart failed to maintain a safe environment, which directly resulted in her injuries. Specifically, Evans alleges that [insert details of the alleged negligence or wrongdoing, such as failure to clean up a spill, inadequate staffing, lack of proper warnings, etc.].
**Legal Issues:**
The primary legal issues in this case involve:
1. **Duty of Care:** Whether Wal-Mart had a duty to provide a safe environment for its customers.
2. **Breach of Duty:** Whether the defendant breached that duty through negligent actions or inactions.
3. **Causation:** Whether the breach of duty was a direct cause of the plaintiff's injuries.
4. **Damages:** What damages the plaintiff has suffered as a result of the incident.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Charde Evans contends that Wal-Mart was negligent in its duty to ensure the safety of its premises, and as a result, she suffered physical and emotional injuries that have impacted her quality of life.
- **Defendant’s Argument:** Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. may argue that they took reasonable precautions to maintain safety and that the plaintiff was at least partially responsible for her injuries. They may also contend that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the extent of her alleged damages.
**Outcome:**
[Insert any available information about the case outcome, such as rulings, settlements, or decisions made by the court if concluded. If ongoing, mention any upcoming court dates or hearings.]
**Importance of the Case:**
This case underscores the responsibilities of retail establishments to ensure customer safety and the legal ramifications of negligence. It contributes to the body of case law concerning premises liability and serves as a precedent for similar cases involving customer injuries in retail environments.
**Notes:**
- [Insert any additional notes or comments relevant to the case.]
- [Include any references to statutes or legal principles applicable.]
This case summary focuses on the key aspects of the litigation concerning Charde Evans and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., providing a concise overview of the facts, legal issues, and significance of the case.