Case Summary
**Case Summary: Charles Hocker v. Pikeville City Police Department**
**Docket Number:** 4443513
**Court:** [Specify Court if known]
**Date:** [Specify Date if known]
**Overview:**
This case involves plaintiff Charles Hocker, who filed a lawsuit against the Pikeville City Police Department. The nature of the complaint and the specific legal issues at hand need to be examined closely to understand the basis of the claims.
**Facts of the Case:**
Charles Hocker alleges that the Pikeville City Police Department committed certain acts (details unspecified) that he claims have resulted in harm or violation of rights. These acts may pertain to misconduct, violation of civil rights, wrongful arrest, failure to act, or other grievances related to law enforcement practices.
**Legal Issues:**
The case likely involves questions of constitutional rights, especially if it deals with claims under §1983 for civil rights violations. The primary legal issues may revolve around the justification for the police's actions, adherence to proper protocol, and whether Hocker's rights were indeed violated as alleged.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Hocker might argue that the actions of the Pikeville City Police Department were unlawful or unconstitutional, leading to damages or other negative consequences for him. He seeks redress, potentially including monetary damages and changes to police practices.
- **Defendant’s Argument:** The Pikeville City Police Department is likely to assert that their actions were justified under the circumstances and within the bounds of the law. They may argue that Hocker's claims lack merit or factual support.
**Outcome:**
[The outcome of the case, including whether it went to trial, settled out of court, or was dismissed, should be included here once known.]
**Significance:**
This case may have implications for law enforcement policy and civil rights within the jurisdiction of the Pikeville City Police Department. It highlights the ongoing issues surrounding police accountability and the balance between law enforcement duties and individual rights.
**Conclusion:**
The case of Charles Hocker v. Pikeville City Police Department presents important questions regarding police conduct and civil rights, reflecting broader societal concerns over law enforcement practices. The exact resolutions and implications will depend on the court's findings and any subsequent actions taken by either party.
*Note: Further details on the specific claims, legal representation, and procedural history would enhance this summary if available.*