Legal Case Summary

Christerphor Ziglar v. Express Messenger Sys., Inc.


Date Argued: Wed Aug 15 2018
Case Number: 17-16920
Docket Number: 7669663
Judges:Siler, Schroeder, Graber
Duration: 30 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Christerphor Ziglar v. Express Messenger Systems, Inc.** **Docket Number:** 7669663 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., [Name of the Court, e.g., Superior Court, District Court]] **Date:** [Specify Date of Decision or Filing] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Christerphor Ziglar - **Defendant:** Express Messenger Systems, Inc. **Case Background:** Christerphor Ziglar filed a lawsuit against Express Messenger Systems, Inc. alleging violations related to employment practices. The specifics of the allegations could involve wrongful termination, workplace discrimination, harassment, wage disputes, or breach of contract. The plaintiff claims damages based on the adverse effects suffered as a result of the defendant's actions. **Legal Issues:** The case raises questions regarding employment law, including but not limited to: - Whether the defendant followed appropriate procedures in their employment practices. - Potential violations of federal or state labor laws. - Rights of the employee under existing labor contracts or agreements. **Procedural History:** Details regarding the progression of the case through the judicial system, including any motions filed, hearings conducted, or previous settlements, would be summarized here. **Ruling:** [Summarize the court's decision, including any findings of fact or conclusions of law. If the case was settled prior to ruling, state the terms of the settlement if available.] **Impact:** Discuss the implications of the verdict, including any potential precedent set for future employment law cases or its effect on the practices of employers in similar industries. **Conclusion:** This case highlights key aspects of employment law and the responsibilities of employers to adhere to labor regulations. The outcome serves as a reminder of the legal recourse available to employees who believe their rights have been violated. (Note: Actual details such as court name, dates, specific allegations, and the ruling would need to be filled in based on actual case documentation.)

Christerphor Ziglar v. Express Messenger Sys., Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available