Case Summary
**Case Summary: Cicciarelli v. The Pleasure Driveway and Park District of Peoria**
**Docket Number:** 3085902
**Court:** Illinois Court of Appeals
**Date:** [Insert Date]
**Overview:**
In *Cicciarelli v. The Pleasure Driveway and Park District of Peoria*, the plaintiff, Cicciarelli, brought suit against the Pleasure Driveway and Park District of Peoria (defendant) for injuries sustained due to alleged negligence related to the maintenance of public property.
**Facts:**
Cicciarelli claimed that while visiting a park operated by the defendant, he encountered a hazardous condition—specifically, an uneven walking surface or an obstacle that led to his fall and resulting injuries. The plaintiff asserted that the park district had a duty to maintain the property in a safe condition for its visitors and that it failed to uphold this duty, leading to his injuries.
**Legal Issues:**
1. Whether the park district owed a duty of care to Cicciarelli as a visitor to the park.
2. Whether the park district breached that duty by failing to maintain the park premises.
3. Whether Cicciarelli was contributorily negligent in the incident.
**Rulings:**
The court examined the evidence presented, including photographs of the site, maintenance records, and witness testimonies. The court assessed whether the park district's actions constituted a breach of duty and if adequate measures were in place to address maintenance issues in the park.
After deliberation, the court concluded that the park district did indeed owe a duty of care to Cicciarelli as a patron of the park and noted its responsibility to ensure a safe environment. However, the court also evaluated evidence regarding Cicciarelli's awareness of the surroundings and whether he exercised reasonable caution while on the property, which could contribute to determining the extent of liability.
**Outcome:**
The court ultimately ruled in favor of one party, determining the degree of negligence, if any, on the part of the park district and the plaintiff, which influenced the damages awarded. [Insert specific outcome, such as whether the park district was found liable or if the case was dismissed based on the plaintiff’s contributory negligence, if applicable.]
**Conclusion:**
*Cicciarelli v. The Pleasure Driveway and Park District of Peoria* serves to illustrate the legal standards surrounding premises liability and the responsibilities of public entities to maintain safe conditions for visitors. This case highlights essential considerations in assessing negligence, including duty of care, breach of that duty, and the potential for contributory negligence on the part of the injured party.
**Note:** This summary is a fictional representation based on the provided case name and docket number and does not reflect actual court records or findings.